PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CYCN vs. XDTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CYCN vs. XDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cyclerion Therapeutics, Inc. (CYCN) and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CYCN achieves a 201.97% return, which is significantly higher than XDTE's 9.76% return.


CYCN

1D
-2.42%
1M
18.00%
6M
132.42%
YTD
201.97%
1Y
5.36%
3Y*
-0.20%
5Y*
-44.74%
10Y*

XDTE

1D
0.46%
1M
2.61%
6M
7.89%
YTD
9.76%
1Y
20.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CYCN vs. XDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CYCN
Cyclerion Therapeutics, Inc.
201.97%-60.56%15.00%
XDTE
Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
9.76%12.60%17.12%

Correlation

The correlation between CYCN and XDTE is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

0.02

The correlation between CYCN and XDTE shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (all time) to 0.13 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CYCN vs. XDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CYCN
CYCN Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CYCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CYCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
CYCN Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CYCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
CYCN Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

XDTE
XDTE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
XDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
XDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CYCN vs. XDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cyclerion Therapeutics, Inc. (CYCN) and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CYCNXDTEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.33

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.11

2.69

-2.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.16

11.57

-11.41

CYCN vs. XDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CYCN Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the XDTE Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CYCN and XDTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CYCN vs. XDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CYCN drawdown since its inception was -99.72%, which is greater than XDTE's maximum drawdown of -19.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CYCN and XDTE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CYCNXDTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.72%

-19.09%

-80.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-70.33%

-7.68%

-62.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-82.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.02%

0.00%

-99.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-88.52%

-2.28%

-86.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

49.50%

1.78%

+47.72%

Volatility

CYCN vs. XDTE - Volatility Comparison

Cyclerion Therapeutics, Inc. (CYCN) has a higher volatility of 15.41% compared to Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) at 3.92%. This indicates that CYCN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CYCNXDTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.41%

3.92%

+11.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

156.84%

9.15%

+147.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

327.77%

11.58%

+316.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

229.75%

13.88%

+215.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

203.06%

13.88%

+189.18%

Dividends

CYCN vs. XDTE - Dividend Comparison

CYCN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 32.50%.


PositionTTM20252024
CYCN
Cyclerion Therapeutics, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDTE
Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
32.50%39.16%20.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


CYCN and XDTE have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CYCN has higher volatility (15.41%) compared to XDTE (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CYCN dropped -99.72% vs XDTE's -19.09%.

XDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CYCN and XDTE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer