PortfoliosLab logo
CYBR vs. FTNT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CYBR and FTNT is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CYBR vs. FTNT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR) and Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CYBR:

1.37

FTNT:

1.70

Sortino Ratio

CYBR:

2.13

FTNT:

2.98

Omega Ratio

CYBR:

1.27

FTNT:

1.41

Calmar Ratio

CYBR:

1.98

FTNT:

2.50

Martin Ratio

CYBR:

5.88

FTNT:

10.59

Ulcer Index

CYBR:

8.83%

FTNT:

7.32%

Daily Std Dev

CYBR:

35.87%

FTNT:

42.29%

Max Drawdown

CYBR:

-55.64%

FTNT:

-51.20%

Current Drawdown

CYBR:

-14.37%

FTNT:

-9.90%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CYBR:

$17.87B

FTNT:

$80.41B

EPS

CYBR:

-$2.13

FTNT:

$2.43

PEG Ratio

CYBR:

4.94

FTNT:

2.85

PS Ratio

CYBR:

17.86

FTNT:

13.09

PB Ratio

CYBR:

7.54

FTNT:

39.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

CYBR:

$779.19M

FTNT:

$6.14B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CYBR:

$613.22M

FTNT:

$5.00B

EBITDA (TTM)

CYBR:

$50.99M

FTNT:

$2.34B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CYBR achieves a 6.49% return, which is significantly lower than FTNT's 9.26% return. Over the past 10 years, CYBR has underperformed FTNT with an annualized return of 19.45%, while FTNT has yielded a comparatively higher 29.67% annualized return.


CYBR

YTD

6.49%

1M

3.32%

6M

21.66%

1Y

48.87%

5Y*

30.14%

10Y*

19.45%

FTNT

YTD

9.26%

1M

6.59%

6M

5.47%

1Y

71.48%

5Y*

29.32%

10Y*

29.67%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CYBR vs. FTNT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CYBR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CYBR is 8989
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CYBR is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CYBR is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CYBR is 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CYBR is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CYBR is 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

FTNT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FTNT is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FTNT is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FTNT is 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FTNT is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FTNT is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FTNT is 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CYBR vs. FTNT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR) and Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CYBR Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the FTNT Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CYBR and FTNT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CYBR vs. FTNT - Dividend Comparison

Neither CYBR nor FTNT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CYBR vs. FTNT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CYBR drawdown since its inception was -55.64%, which is greater than FTNT's maximum drawdown of -51.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CYBR and FTNT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CYBR vs. FTNT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR) is 9.44%, while Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) has a volatility of 13.67%. This indicates that CYBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CYBR vs. FTNT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CyberArk Software Ltd. and Fortinet, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20212022202320242025
314.38M
1.54B
(CYBR) Total Revenue
(FTNT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CYBR vs. FTNT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CyberArk Software Ltd. and Fortinet, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

74.0%76.0%78.0%80.0%82.0%84.0%20212022202320242025
76.5%
81.0%
(CYBR) Gross Margin
(FTNT) Gross Margin
CYBR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported a gross profit of 240.62M and revenue of 314.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.5%.

FTNT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Fortinet, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.25B and revenue of 1.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.0%.

CYBR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported an operating income of -15.99M and revenue of 314.38M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.1%.

FTNT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Fortinet, Inc. reported an operating income of 453.80M and revenue of 1.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.5%.

CYBR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported a net income of -97.12M and revenue of 314.38M, resulting in a net margin of -30.9%.

FTNT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Fortinet, Inc. reported a net income of 433.40M and revenue of 1.54B, resulting in a net margin of 28.2%.