CYB.TO vs. MKL
Compare and contrast key facts about Cymbria Corporation (CYB.TO) and Markel Corporation (MKL).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CYB.TO or MKL.
Key characteristics
| CYB.TO | MKL | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 19.45% | 11.60% |
| 1Y Return | 20.11% | 2.76% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.64% | 9.78% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 5.79% | 5.99% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 11.61% | 9.51% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.64 | 0.11 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.26% | 23.11% |
| Max Drawdown | -39.71% | -61.32% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.43% | -4.72% |
Fundamentals
| CYB.TO | MKL | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | CA$1.58B | $20.51B |
| EPS | CA$7.03 | $153.87 |
| PE Ratio | 10.30 | 10.30 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | 4.39 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | CA$281.18M | $16.19B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$268.02M | $16.63B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | CA$208.80M | -$61.03M |
Correlation
The correlation between CYB.TO and MKL is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CYB.TO vs. MKL - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CYB.TO achieves a 19.45% return, which is significantly higher than MKL's 11.60% return. Over the past 10 years, CYB.TO has outperformed MKL with an annualized return of 11.61%, while MKL has yielded a comparatively lower 9.51% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CYB.TO vs. MKL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cymbria Corporation (CYB.TO) and Markel Corporation (MKL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CYB.TO vs. MKL - Dividend Comparison
Neither CYB.TO nor MKL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CYB.TO vs. MKL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CYB.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.71%, smaller than the maximum MKL drawdown of -61.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CYB.TO and MKL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CYB.TO vs. MKL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cymbria Corporation (CYB.TO) is 3.63%, while Markel Corporation (MKL) has a volatility of 4.39%. This indicates that CYB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MKL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CYB.TO vs. MKL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cymbria Corporation and Markel Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities