CYB.TO vs. BRK-B

In the year-to-date period, CYB.TO achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly lower than BRK-B's 11.07% return. Over the past 10 years, CYB.TO has underperformed BRK-B with an annualized return of 8.09%, while BRK-B has yielded a comparatively higher 13.36% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cymbria Corporation (CYB.TO) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CYB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the BRK-B Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CYB.TO and BRK-B, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither CYB.TO nor BRK-B has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum CYB.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.71%, smaller than the maximum BRK-B drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CYB.TO and BRK-B.

The current volatility for Cymbria Corporation (CYB.TO) is 4.63%, while Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that CYB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cymbria Corporation and Berkshire Hathaway Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.