CXSE vs. ICLN

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN).

CXSE and ICLN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CXSE is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index. It was launched on Sep 19, 2012. ICLN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Clean Energy Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2008. Both CXSE and ICLN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CXSE vs. ICLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CXSE vs. ICLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund	-5.37%	37.00%	8.56%	-18.02%	-29.32%	-23.67%	59.39%	37.96%	-28.55%	81.50%
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF	11.08%	47.05%	-25.72%	-20.41%	-5.43%	-24.18%	141.82%	44.36%	-9.03%	21.47%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXSE achieves a -5.37% return, which is significantly lower than ICLN's 11.08% return. Over the past 10 years, CXSE has underperformed ICLN with an annualized return of 6.57%, while ICLN has yielded a comparatively higher 8.94% annualized return.

CXSE

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: -3.35%
• YTD: -5.37%
• 6M: -14.60%
• 1Y: 13.26%
• 3Y*: 4.84%
• 5Y*: -9.25%
• 10Y*: 6.57%

ICLN

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -0.44%
• YTD: 11.08%
• 6M: 15.82%
• 1Y: 61.77%
• 3Y*: -1.04%
• 5Y*: -4.16%
• 10Y*: 8.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CXSE vs. ICLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CXSE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than ICLN's 0.46% expense ratio.

ICLN

iShares Global Clean Energy ETF

CXSE

WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

Return for Risk

CXSE vs. ICLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXSE

CXSE Risk / Return Rank: 27
CXSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
CXSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
CXSE Omega Ratio Rank: 28
CXSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
CXSE Martin Ratio Rank: 24

ICLN

ICLN Risk / Return Rank: 94
ICLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ICLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
ICLN Omega Ratio Rank: 89
ICLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
ICLN Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CXSE vs. ICLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CXSE	ICLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.53	2.38	-1.84
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.86	3.01	-2.15
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.38	-0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.77	5.60	-4.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.80	15.65	-13.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CXSE vs. ICLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXSE Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is lower than the ICLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXSE and ICLN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CXSE	ICLN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53	2.38	-1.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.29	-0.15	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23	0.33	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	-0.12	+0.30

Correlation

The correlation between CXSE and ICLN is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CXSE vs. ICLN - Dividend Comparison

CXSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, more than ICLN's 1.47% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund	2.12%	1.95%	1.70%	1.71%	1.55%	0.86%	0.54%	0.96%	1.49%	1.24%	1.39%	2.50%
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF	1.47%	1.63%	1.85%	1.59%	0.89%	1.18%	0.34%	1.36%	2.77%	2.49%	3.88%	2.36%

Drawdowns

CXSE vs. ICLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXSE drawdown since its inception was -70.01%, smaller than the maximum ICLN drawdown of -87.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXSE and ICLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	CXSE	ICLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.01%	-87.15%	+17.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.70%	-11.22%	-6.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.47%	-57.16%	-7.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-70.01%	-66.75%	-3.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.38%	-50.31%	+0.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.59%	-66.84%	+39.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.64%	4.01%	+3.63%

Volatility

CXSE vs. ICLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) is 6.47%, while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has a volatility of 10.23%. This indicates that CXSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CXSE	ICLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.47%	10.23%	-3.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.27%	20.47%	-5.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.92%	26.14%	-1.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.28%	27.16%	+5.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.64%	27.04%	+1.60%