CX vs. RIO
Compare and contrast key facts about CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CX or RIO.
Correlation
The correlation between CX and RIO is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CX vs. RIO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CX:
-0.86
RIO:
-0.23
CX:
-1.19
RIO:
-0.16
CX:
0.86
RIO:
0.98
CX:
-0.43
RIO:
-0.23
CX:
-1.36
RIO:
-0.47
CX:
25.61%
RIO:
11.70%
CX:
40.56%
RIO:
24.39%
CX:
-93.79%
RIO:
-88.97%
CX:
-79.15%
RIO:
-15.72%
Fundamentals
CX:
$7.83B
RIO:
$94.51B
CX:
$0.63
RIO:
$7.07
CX:
8.57
RIO:
8.23
CX:
0.11
RIO:
0.00
CX:
0.48
RIO:
1.76
CX:
0.64
RIO:
1.71
CX:
$12.40B
RIO:
$53.66B
CX:
$4.06B
RIO:
$16.18B
CX:
$1.50B
RIO:
$19.83B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CX achieves a -3.93% return, which is significantly lower than RIO's 2.52% return. Over the past 10 years, CX has underperformed RIO with an annualized return of -4.31%, while RIO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.61% annualized return.
CX
-3.93%
-11.48%
-8.92%
-32.25%
20.38%
-4.31%
RIO
2.52%
-8.91%
-7.75%
-6.96%
13.00%
11.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CX vs. RIO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CX
RIO
CX vs. RIO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CX vs. RIO - Dividend Comparison
CX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, less than RIO's 6.91% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CX CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. | 1.54% | 1.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RIO Rio Tinto Group | 6.91% | 7.40% | 5.40% | 10.48% | 14.39% | 5.13% | 10.70% | 6.32% | 4.45% | 3.96% | 7.79% | 4.46% |
Drawdowns
CX vs. RIO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CX drawdown since its inception was -93.79%, which is greater than RIO's maximum drawdown of -88.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CX and RIO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CX vs. RIO - Volatility Comparison
CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) has a higher volatility of 16.01% compared to Rio Tinto Group (RIO) at 11.80%. This indicates that CX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CX vs. RIO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. and Rio Tinto Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities