CWK vs. XMMO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CWK (Cushman & Wakefield plc) is a stock, while XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) is Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Over the past 5 years, CWK returned -6.90%/yr vs 16.69%/yr for XMMO. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

CWK vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cushman & Wakefield plc (CWK) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWK achieves a -21.80% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 23.73% return.

CWK

• 1D: -3.51%
• 1M: -8.59%
• YTD: -21.80%
• 6M: -22.43%
• 1Y: 25.84%
• 3Y*: 14.02%
• 5Y*: -6.90%
• 10Y*: —

XMMO

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 6.87%
• YTD: 23.73%
• 6M: 25.73%
• 1Y: 36.97%
• 3Y*: 32.10%
• 5Y*: 16.69%
• 10Y*: 19.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWK vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CWK Cushman & Wakefield plc	-21.80%	23.78%	21.11%	-13.32%	-43.97%	49.97%	-27.45%	41.26%	-18.75%
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF	23.73%	13.04%	38.03%	20.39%	-16.02%	16.69%	29.17%	36.78%	-11.29%

Correlation

The correlation between CWK and XMMO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018	0.56

The correlation between CWK and XMMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CWK vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWK

CWK Risk / Return Rank: 57
CWK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
CWK Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
CWK Omega Ratio Rank: 55
CWK Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
CWK Martin Ratio Rank: 58

XMMO

XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 67
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWK vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cushman & Wakefield plc (CWK) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CWK	XMMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.61	1.99	-1.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.11	2.77	-1.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.35	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.83	4.45	-3.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.83	18.21	-16.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CWK vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWK Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWK and XMMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CWK	XMMO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61	1.99	-1.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.16	0.78	-0.95
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.89	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.09	0.58	-0.67

Drawdowns

CWK vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWK drawdown since its inception was -71.84%, which is greater than XMMO's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWK and XMMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CWK	XMMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.84%	-55.37%	-16.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.40%	-8.34%	-23.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.97%	-24.93%	-24.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-71.84%	-27.91%	-43.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.24%	0.00%	-45.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.87%	-9.45%	-23.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.12%	2.04%	+12.08%

Volatility

CWK vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

Cushman & Wakefield plc (CWK) has a higher volatility of 11.64% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) at 7.82%. This indicates that CWK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CWK	XMMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.64%	7.82%	+3.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.23%	15.54%	+18.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.77%	18.71%	+24.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.50%	21.45%	+21.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.20%	22.27%	+24.93%

Dividends

CWK vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

CWK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CWK Cushman & Wakefield plc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF	0.60%	0.78%	0.34%	0.80%	1.43%	0.41%	0.61%	0.60%	0.19%	0.21%	0.22%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CWK and XMMO in my portfolio?

CWK and XMMO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CWK or XMMO?

CWK has higher volatility (11.64%) compared to XMMO (7.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWK dropped -71.84% vs XMMO's -55.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.