CWK vs. NMRK
CWK (Cushman & Wakefield plc) and NMRK (Newmark Group, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Real Estate - Services industry within the Real Estate sector. Over the past 5 years, CWK returned -6.90%/yr vs 2.74%/yr for NMRK. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CWK vs. NMRK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWK achieves a -21.80% return, which is significantly lower than NMRK's -18.95% return.
CWK
- 1D
- -3.51%
- 1M
- -8.59%
- YTD
- -21.80%
- 6M
- -22.43%
- 1Y
- 25.84%
- 3Y*
- 14.02%
- 5Y*
- -6.90%
- 10Y*
- —
NMRK
- 1D
- -3.12%
- 1M
- -10.34%
- YTD
- -18.95%
- 6M
- -20.91%
- 1Y
- 27.75%
- 3Y*
- 33.74%
- 5Y*
- 2.74%
- 10Y*
- —
CWK vs. NMRK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWK Cushman & Wakefield plc | -21.80% | 23.78% | 21.11% | -13.32% | -43.97% | 49.97% | -27.45% | 41.26% | -18.75% |
NMRK Newmark Group, Inc. | -18.95% | 36.47% | 18.06% | 39.87% | -56.96% | 157.32% | -44.91% | 74.73% | -38.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWK and NMRK is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018 | 0.70 |
The correlation between CWK and NMRK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
CWK:
$2.98B
NMRK:
$3.58B
CWK:
$0.31
NMRK:
$0.59
CWK:
40.40
NMRK:
23.78
CWK:
0.00
NMRK:
12.97
CWK:
0.28
NMRK:
1.02
CWK:
1.53
NMRK:
2.11
CWK:
$10.54B
NMRK:
$3.48B
CWK:
$1.39B
NMRK:
$3.38B
CWK:
$309.80M
NMRK:
$459.76M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWK vs. NMRK — Risk / Return Rank
CWK
NMRK
CWK vs. NMRK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cushman & Wakefield plc (CWK) and Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CWK | NMRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.15 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | 0.96 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.83 | 1.89 | -0.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CWK | NMRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 0.73 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | 0.06 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 0.03 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
CWK vs. NMRK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWK drawdown since its inception was -71.84%, smaller than the maximum NMRK drawdown of -83.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWK and NMRK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWK | NMRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.84% | -83.84% | +12.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.40% | -29.08% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.97% | -36.60% | -12.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.84% | -71.92% | +0.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.24% | -28.09% | -17.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.87% | -35.75% | +2.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.12% | 14.68% | -0.56% |
Volatility
CWK vs. NMRK - Volatility Comparison
Cushman & Wakefield plc (CWK) and Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) have volatilities of 11.64% and 11.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWK | NMRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.64% | 11.54% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.23% | 29.39% | +4.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.77% | 37.93% | +4.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.50% | 42.78% | -0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.20% | 57.06% | -9.86% |
Dividends
CWK vs. NMRK - Dividend Comparison
CWK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NMRK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWK Cushman & Wakefield plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NMRK Newmark Group, Inc. | 1.07% | 0.69% | 0.94% | 1.09% | 1.25% | 0.21% | 1.78% | 2.90% | 3.37% |
Financials
CWK vs. NMRK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cushman & Wakefield plc and Newmark Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CWK vs. NMRK - Profitability Comparison
CWK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cushman & Wakefield plc reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
NMRK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Newmark Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 800.93M and revenue of 847.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 94.5%.
CWK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cushman & Wakefield plc reported an operating income of 58.70M and revenue of 2.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.3%.
NMRK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Newmark Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 26.96M and revenue of 847.16M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.
CWK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cushman & Wakefield plc reported a net income of -12.60M and revenue of 2.54B, resulting in a net margin of -0.5%.
NMRK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Newmark Group, Inc. reported a net income of 14.42M and revenue of 847.16M, resulting in a net margin of 1.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CWK and NMRK have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CWK has higher volatility (11.64%) compared to NMRK (11.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWK dropped -71.84% vs NMRK's -83.84%.
NMRK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWK and NMRK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer