PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWK vs. CBRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CWK vs. CBRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cushman & Wakefield plc (CWK) and CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CWK having a -21.80% return and CBRE slightly higher at -21.62%.


CWK

1D
-3.51%
1M
-8.59%
YTD
-21.80%
6M
-22.43%
1Y
25.84%
3Y*
14.02%
5Y*
-6.90%
10Y*

CBRE

1D
-1.43%
1M
-10.01%
YTD
-21.62%
6M
-22.34%
1Y
0.87%
3Y*
17.78%
5Y*
7.46%
10Y*
15.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWK vs. CBRE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CWK
Cushman & Wakefield plc
-21.80%23.78%21.11%-13.32%-43.97%49.97%-27.45%41.26%-18.75%
CBRE
CBRE Group, Inc.
-21.62%22.47%41.04%20.96%-29.08%73.01%2.33%53.07%-18.82%

Correlation

The correlation between CWK and CBRE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018

0.76

The correlation between CWK and CBRE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CWK:

$2.98B

CBRE:

$37.43B

EPS

CWK:

$0.31

CBRE:

$4.37

PE Ratio

CWK:

40.40

CBRE:

28.82

PS Ratio

CWK:

0.28

CBRE:

0.90

PB Ratio

CWK:

1.53

CBRE:

4.39

Total Revenue (TTM)

CWK:

$10.54B

CBRE:

$42.17B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CWK:

$1.39B

CBRE:

$14.76B

EBITDA (TTM)

CWK:

$309.80M

CBRE:

$2.68B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CWK vs. CBRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWK
CWK Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
CWK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWK Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
CWK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWK Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

CBRE
CBRE Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
CBRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBRE Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
CBRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBRE Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWK vs. CBRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cushman & Wakefield plc (CWK) and CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CWKCBREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.03

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

0.03

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.83

0.08

+1.76

CWK vs. CBRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWK Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is higher than the CBRE Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWK and CBRE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CWKCBREDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

0.03

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

0.25

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

0.29

-0.38

Drawdowns

CWK vs. CBRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWK drawdown since its inception was -71.84%, smaller than the maximum CBRE drawdown of -94.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWK and CBRE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWKCBREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.84%

-94.31%

+22.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.40%

-27.37%

-4.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.97%

-27.37%

-21.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.84%

-40.38%

-31.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.24%

-26.56%

-18.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.87%

-26.59%

-6.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.12%

11.18%

+2.94%

Volatility

CWK vs. CBRE - Volatility Comparison

Cushman & Wakefield plc (CWK) has a higher volatility of 11.64% compared to CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) at 9.04%. This indicates that CWK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWKCBREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.64%

9.04%

+2.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.23%

25.49%

+8.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.77%

30.31%

+12.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.50%

30.22%

+12.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.20%

32.99%

+14.21%

Dividends

CWK vs. CBRE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CWK nor CBRE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CWK vs. CBRE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cushman & Wakefield plc and CBRE Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
2.54B
10.53B
(CWK) Total Revenue
(CBRE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CWK vs. CBRE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cushman & Wakefield plc and CBRE Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
17.6%
Portfolio components
CWK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cushman & Wakefield plc reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CBRE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CBRE Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.85B and revenue of 10.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.6%.

CWK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cushman & Wakefield plc reported an operating income of 58.70M and revenue of 2.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.3%.

CBRE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CBRE Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 511.00M and revenue of 10.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

CWK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cushman & Wakefield plc reported a net income of -12.60M and revenue of 2.54B, resulting in a net margin of -0.5%.

CBRE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CBRE Group, Inc. reported a net income of 318.00M and revenue of 10.53B, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CWK and CBRE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CWK has higher volatility (11.64%) compared to CBRE (9.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWK dropped -71.84% vs CBRE's -94.31%.

CWK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CWK and CBRE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer