CWH vs. IIPR
Compare and contrast key facts about Camping World Holdings, Inc. (CWH) and Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CWH or IIPR.
Key characteristics
| CWH | IIPR | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -6.41% | 7.81% |
| 1Y Return | 15.88% | 37.07% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -11.95% | -23.76% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 21.57% | 9.92% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.36 | 1.28 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.85 | 1.75 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.10 | 1.24 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.31 | 0.57 |
| Martin Ratio | 0.87 | 6.29 |
| Ulcer Index | 20.13% | 6.18% |
| Daily Std Dev | 48.73% | 30.36% |
| Max Drawdown | -90.86% | -75.43% |
| Current Drawdown | -38.78% | -55.59% |
Fundamentals
| CWH | IIPR | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.39B | $2.95B |
| EPS | -$0.66 | $5.69 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.70 | 0.00 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $6.00B | $310.93M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $1.75B | $231.15M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $173.04M | $243.41M |
Correlation
The correlation between CWH and IIPR is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CWH vs. IIPR - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CWH achieves a -6.41% return, which is significantly lower than IIPR's 7.81% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CWH vs. IIPR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Camping World Holdings, Inc. (CWH) and Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CWH vs. IIPR - Dividend Comparison
CWH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than IIPR's 7.19% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWH Camping World Holdings, Inc. | 2.07% | 5.71% | 11.20% | 4.28% | 5.67% | 4.15% | 5.34% | 1.66% | 0.25% |
IIPR Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. | 7.19% | 7.16% | 7.01% | 2.18% | 2.44% | 3.73% | 2.64% | 1.70% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CWH vs. IIPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWH drawdown since its inception was -90.86%, which is greater than IIPR's maximum drawdown of -75.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWH and IIPR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CWH vs. IIPR - Volatility Comparison
Camping World Holdings, Inc. (CWH) has a higher volatility of 21.13% compared to Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) at 14.53%. This indicates that CWH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IIPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CWH vs. IIPR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Camping World Holdings, Inc. and Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities