CWH vs. IIPR
Compare and contrast key facts about Camping World Holdings, Inc. (CWH) and Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR).
Performance
CWH vs. IIPR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CWH vs. IIPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWH Camping World Holdings, Inc. | -29.80% | -52.24% | -17.93% | 25.13% | -39.63% | 61.88% | 90.21% | 35.35% | -73.62% | 40.00% |
IIPR Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. | 10.03% | -18.40% | -28.55% | 8.78% | -59.02% | 47.49% | 151.33% | 72.52% | 43.88% | 82.30% |
Fundamentals
CWH:
$428.40M
IIPR:
$1.42B
CWH:
$5.51
IIPR:
$4.14
CWH:
1.24
IIPR:
12.12
CWH:
0.07
IIPR:
5.34
CWH:
1.87
IIPR:
0.79
CWH:
$6.37B
IIPR:
$265.96M
CWH:
$1.88B
IIPR:
$235.78M
CWH:
$545.79M
IIPR:
$205.79M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWH achieves a -29.80% return, which is significantly lower than IIPR's 10.03% return.
CWH
- 1D
- 3.80%
- 1M
- -17.91%
- YTD
- -29.80%
- 6M
- -56.22%
- 1Y
- -56.61%
- 3Y*
- -29.01%
- 5Y*
- -25.08%
- 10Y*
- —
IIPR
- 1D
- 2.66%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 10.03%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 7.31%
- 3Y*
- -3.14%
- 5Y*
- -16.29%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWH vs. IIPR — Risk / Return Rank
CWH
IIPR
CWH vs. IIPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Camping World Holdings, Inc. (CWH) and Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CWH | IIPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | 0.18 | -0.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.01 | 0.56 | -1.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.07 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | -0.29 | -0.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.83 | -0.70 | -1.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CWH | IIPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.79 | 0.18 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.47 | -0.40 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.13 | 0.37 | -0.49 |
Correlation
The correlation between CWH and IIPR is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CWH vs. IIPR - Dividend Comparison
CWH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.49%, less than IIPR's 15.15% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWH Camping World Holdings, Inc. | 5.49% | 5.14% | 2.37% | 5.71% | 11.20% | 4.28% | 5.67% | 4.16% | 5.34% | 1.66% | 0.25% |
IIPR Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. | 15.15% | 16.05% | 11.28% | 7.16% | 7.01% | 2.18% | 2.44% | 3.73% | 1.87% | 1.70% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CWH vs. IIPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWH drawdown since its inception was -90.83%, which is greater than IIPR's maximum drawdown of -78.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWH and IIPR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWH | IIPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.83% | -78.42% | -12.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.05% | -21.29% | -47.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.72% | -78.42% | -6.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.00% | -73.58% | -8.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.51% | -36.35% | -4.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.31% | 8.73% | +22.58% |
Volatility
CWH vs. IIPR - Volatility Comparison
Camping World Holdings, Inc. (CWH) has a higher volatility of 22.51% compared to Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) at 9.37%. This indicates that CWH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IIPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CWH | IIPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.51% | 9.37% | +13.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.49% | 28.46% | +26.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.97% | 42.31% | +29.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.60% | 41.17% | +12.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.16% | 48.45% | +13.71% |
Financials
CWH vs. IIPR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Camping World Holdings, Inc. and Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CWH vs. IIPR - Profitability Comparison
CWH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Camping World Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 338.24M and revenue of 1.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.8%.
IIPR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. reported a gross profit of 58.68M and revenue of 66.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.0%.
CWH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Camping World Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -50.05M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in an operating margin of -4.3%.
IIPR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. reported an operating income of 31.85M and revenue of 66.66M, resulting in an operating margin of 47.8%.
CWH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Camping World Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 368.46M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in a net margin of 31.4%.
IIPR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. reported a net income of 30.71M and revenue of 66.66M, resulting in a net margin of 46.1%.