PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWGIX vs. FOCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CWGIX vs. FOCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class A (CWGIX) and Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWGIX achieves a 16.44% return, which is significantly lower than FOCPX's 27.59% return. Over the past 10 years, CWGIX has underperformed FOCPX with an annualized return of 12.15%, while FOCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.63% annualized return.


CWGIX

1D
0.67%
1M
6.71%
YTD
16.44%
6M
17.98%
1Y
34.17%
3Y*
22.22%
5Y*
11.45%
10Y*
12.15%

FOCPX

1D
0.78%
1M
10.68%
YTD
27.59%
6M
28.74%
1Y
61.90%
3Y*
34.85%
5Y*
19.55%
10Y*
22.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWGIX vs. FOCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CWGIX
American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class A
16.44%24.68%13.85%20.55%-17.32%14.74%15.31%25.32%-10.60%24.55%
FOCPX
Fidelity OTC Portfolio
27.59%22.21%38.95%42.64%-32.08%24.94%46.75%39.20%-3.30%38.61%

Correlation

The correlation between CWGIX and FOCPX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 1993

0.73

The correlation between CWGIX and FOCPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CWGIX vs. FOCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWGIX
CWGIX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
CWGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
CWGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FOCPX
FOCPX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FOCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FOCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWGIX vs. FOCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class A (CWGIX) and Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CWGIXFOCPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.59

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

5.57

-2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.47

24.59

-10.13

CWGIX vs. FOCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWGIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the FOCPX Sharpe Ratio of 3.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWGIX and FOCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CWGIXFOCPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

3.55

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.87

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

1.01

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.66

+0.03

Drawdowns

CWGIX vs. FOCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWGIX drawdown since its inception was -54.47%, smaller than the maximum FOCPX drawdown of -70.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWGIX and FOCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWGIXFOCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.47%

-70.25%

+15.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.52%

-11.29%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.56%

-24.82%

+9.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.18%

-37.05%

+9.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.00%

-37.05%

+5.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.13%

-17.01%

+9.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.39%

2.55%

-0.16%

Volatility

CWGIX vs. FOCPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class A (CWGIX) is 4.41%, while Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that CWGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWGIXFOCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

5.41%

-1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.08%

13.89%

-2.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.51%

17.71%

-4.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.20%

22.66%

-7.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

22.44%

-6.39%

CWGIX vs. FOCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWGIX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FOCPX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

CWGIX vs. FOCPX - Dividend Comparison

CWGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.08%, more than FOCPX's 6.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CWGIX
American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class A
9.08%10.54%7.88%3.20%2.09%6.82%1.23%2.44%7.00%6.63%4.96%3.78%
FOCPX
Fidelity OTC Portfolio
6.09%7.78%16.76%0.05%4.06%11.53%6.23%7.58%7.93%4.86%3.24%5.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


CWGIX and FOCPX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FOCPX has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to CWGIX (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWGIX dropped -54.47% vs FOCPX's -70.25%.

FOCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.55 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CWGIX and FOCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer