CWEB vs. SSO
CWEB (Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares) and SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) are both exchange-traded funds - CWEB is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%), while SSO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CWEB returned -40.57%/yr vs 18.24%/yr for SSO. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CWEB charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for SSO.
Performance
CWEB vs. SSO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWEB achieves a -40.10% return, which is significantly lower than SSO's 17.80% return.
CWEB
- 1D
- 3.40%
- 1M
- 11.42%
- 6M
- -47.01%
- YTD
- -40.10%
- 1Y
- -40.81%
- 3Y*
- -14.07%
- 5Y*
- -40.57%
- 10Y*
- —
SSO
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- 6M
- 14.60%
- YTD
- 17.80%
- 1Y
- 37.75%
- 3Y*
- 32.35%
- 5Y*
- 18.24%
- 10Y*
- 23.26%
CWEB vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | -40.10% | 29.04% | 0.12% | -32.85% | -59.43% | -79.35% | 116.38% | 51.24% | -63.01% | 166.27% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 17.80% | 26.19% | 43.48% | 46.65% | -38.98% | 60.57% | 21.54% | 63.45% | -14.60% | 44.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWEB and SSO is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2016 | 0.47 |
The correlation between CWEB and SSO shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (3 years) to 0.50 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CWEB vs. SSO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CWEB
SSO
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
CWEB
SSO
Consumer Cyclical
CWEB
SSO
Healthcare
CWEB
SSO
Real Estate
CWEB
SSO
Consumer Defensive
CWEB
SSO
Technology
CWEB
SSO
Financial Services
CWEB
SSO
Basic Materials
CWEB
-
SSO
Energy
CWEB
-
SSO
Industrials
CWEB
-
SSO
Utilities
CWEB
-
SSO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWEB vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank
CWEB
SSO
CWEB vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWEB | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.27 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 2.09 | -2.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | 8.58 | -9.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWEB vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWEB drawdown since its inception was -98.18%, which is greater than SSO's maximum drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWEB and SSO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWEB | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.18% | -84.67% | -13.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.36% | -18.17% | -51.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.36% | -35.21% | -34.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.46% | -46.73% | -47.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.56% | -2.70% | -94.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.85% | -19.48% | -46.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.43% | 4.41% | +34.02% |
Volatility
CWEB vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) has a higher volatility of 17.07% compared to ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) at 6.83%. This indicates that CWEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWEB | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.07% | 6.83% | +10.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.45% | 19.92% | +20.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.88% | 25.02% | +29.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.37% | 33.87% | +60.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.41% | 35.86% | +44.55% |
CWEB vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWEB has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWEB vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison
CWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%, more than SSO's 0.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | 6.06% | 2.77% | 4.59% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.64% | 1.59% | 2.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.67% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWEB and SSO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CWEB has higher volatility (17.07%) compared to SSO (6.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWEB dropped -98.18% vs SSO's -84.67%.
On 5-year performance, SSO leads with 18.24% vs -40.57% for CWEB. On fees, SSO is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, SSO has been the lower-risk option at 6.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SSO has performed better with a 18.24% return vs -40.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SSO is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CWEB.
CWEB has the higher dividend yield at 6.06%, compared with 0.67% for SSO.
CWEB is categorized as China Equities, while SSO is Leveraged Equities. CWEB tracks CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%), while SSO tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CWEB and 0.87% for SSO.
SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWEB and SSO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer