CWEB vs. SOXL
CWEB (Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares) and SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CWEB is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%), while SOXL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the ICE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CWEB returned -40.57%/yr vs 31.92%/yr for SOXL. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CWEB charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SOXL.
Performance
CWEB vs. SOXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWEB achieves a -40.10% return, which is significantly lower than SOXL's 239.00% return.
CWEB
- 1D
- 3.40%
- 1M
- 11.42%
- 6M
- -47.01%
- YTD
- -40.10%
- 1Y
- -40.81%
- 3Y*
- -14.07%
- 5Y*
- -40.57%
- 10Y*
- —
SOXL
- 1D
- -13.94%
- 1M
- -37.01%
- 6M
- 145.32%
- YTD
- 239.00%
- 1Y
- 427.27%
- 3Y*
- 72.95%
- 5Y*
- 31.92%
- 10Y*
- 53.10%
CWEB vs. SOXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | -40.10% | 29.04% | 0.12% | -32.85% | -59.43% | -79.35% | 116.38% | 51.24% | -63.01% | 166.27% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 239.00% | 54.91% | -12.31% | 226.98% | -85.66% | 118.84% | 70.04% | 231.83% | -39.07% | 141.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWEB and SOXL is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2016 | 0.48 |
The correlation between CWEB and SOXL shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (3 years) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CWEB vs. SOXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CWEB
SOXL
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
CWEB
SOXL
-
Consumer Cyclical
CWEB
SOXL
-
Healthcare
CWEB
SOXL
-
Real Estate
CWEB
SOXL
-
Consumer Defensive
CWEB
SOXL
-
Technology
CWEB
SOXL
Financial Services
CWEB
SOXL
-
Basic Materials
CWEB
-
SOXL
-
Energy
CWEB
-
SOXL
-
Industrials
CWEB
-
SOXL
-
Utilities
CWEB
-
SOXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWEB vs. SOXL — Risk / Return Rank
CWEB
SOXL
CWEB vs. SOXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWEB | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.40 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 8.19 | -8.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | 26.43 | -27.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWEB vs. SOXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWEB drawdown since its inception was -98.18%, which is greater than SOXL's maximum drawdown of -90.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWEB and SOXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWEB | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.18% | -90.46% | -7.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.36% | -52.63% | -16.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.36% | -87.88% | +18.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.46% | -90.46% | -4.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -90.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.56% | -52.63% | -44.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.85% | -34.95% | -30.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.43% | 16.27% | +22.16% |
Volatility
CWEB vs. SOXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) is 17.07%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a volatility of 60.71%. This indicates that CWEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWEB | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.07% | 60.71% | -43.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.45% | 109.63% | -69.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.88% | 124.91% | -70.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.37% | 112.01% | -17.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.41% | 101.43% | -21.02% |
CWEB vs. SOXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWEB has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXL's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWEB vs. SOXL - Dividend Comparison
CWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%, more than SOXL's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | 6.06% | 2.77% | 4.59% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.64% | 1.59% | 2.98% | 0.00% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 0.01% | 0.34% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 1.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.38% | 1.30% | 0.09% | 4.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWEB and SOXL have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXL has higher volatility (60.71%) compared to CWEB (17.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWEB dropped -98.18% vs SOXL's -90.46%.
On 5-year performance, SOXL leads with 31.92% vs -40.57% for CWEB. On fees, SOXL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, CWEB has been the lower-risk option at 17.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SOXL has performed better with a 31.92% return vs -40.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CWEB.
CWEB has the higher dividend yield at 6.06%, compared with 0.01% for SOXL.
CWEB is categorized as China Equities, while SOXL is Leveraged Equities. CWEB tracks CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%), while SOXL tracks ICE Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CWEB and 0.75% for SOXL.
SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWEB and SOXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer