CWCO vs. FANG
Compare and contrast key facts about Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG).
Performance
CWCO vs. FANG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CWCO vs. FANG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWCO Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. | -5.46% | 38.70% | -26.46% | 144.17% | 42.62% | -9.12% | -24.11% | 43.03% | -4.40% | 18.30% |
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 27.56% | -5.64% | 10.35% | 19.66% | 35.34% | 127.51% | -46.00% | 0.92% | -26.35% | 24.93% |
Fundamentals
CWCO:
$1.05
FANG:
$5.75
CWCO:
31.46
FANG:
33.15
CWCO:
4.06
FANG:
3.68
CWCO:
$130.83M
FANG:
$14.98B
CWCO:
$46.58M
FANG:
$7.48B
CWCO:
$24.46M
FANG:
$7.31B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWCO achieves a -5.46% return, which is significantly lower than FANG's 27.56% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CWCO having a 12.93% annualized return and FANG not far behind at 12.44%.
CWCO
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -12.62%
- YTD
- -5.46%
- 6M
- -1.61%
- 1Y
- 37.70%
- 3Y*
- 28.24%
- 5Y*
- 22.46%
- 10Y*
- 12.93%
FANG
- 1D
- -3.63%
- 1M
- 7.15%
- YTD
- 27.56%
- 6M
- 34.51%
- 1Y
- 21.73%
- 3Y*
- 16.36%
- 5Y*
- 23.73%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWCO vs. FANG — Risk / Return Rank
CWCO
FANG
CWCO vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CWCO | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.30 | 0.56 | +0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.91 | 0.98 | +0.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.13 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 0.86 | +0.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.89 | 2.18 | +4.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CWCO | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 0.56 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.62 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.25 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.46 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between CWCO and FANG is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CWCO vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison
CWCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, less than FANG's 2.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWCO Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. | 1.69% | 1.42% | 1.16% | 1.01% | 2.30% | 3.20% | 2.82% | 2.09% | 3.64% | 1.79% | 2.76% | 2.45% |
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 2.12% | 2.66% | 5.06% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CWCO vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWCO drawdown since its inception was -81.47%, smaller than the maximum FANG drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWCO and FANG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWCO | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.47% | -88.72% | +7.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.58% | -26.16% | +5.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.23% | -42.10% | +3.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.74% | -88.72% | +40.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.53% | -5.72% | -7.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.41% | -19.57% | -18.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.52% | 10.33% | -4.81% |
Volatility
CWCO vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison
Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) has a higher volatility of 14.13% compared to Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) at 8.16%. This indicates that CWCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CWCO | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.13% | 8.16% | +5.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.11% | 20.91% | +1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.17% | 39.22% | -10.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.35% | 38.39% | -1.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.96% | 48.95% | -10.99% |
Financials
CWCO vs. FANG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities