CWCO vs. FANG
Compare and contrast key facts about Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CWCO or FANG.
Correlation
The correlation between CWCO and FANG is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CWCO vs. FANG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CWCO:
-0.79
FANG:
0.14
CWCO:
-1.01
FANG:
0.39
CWCO:
0.88
FANG:
1.05
CWCO:
-0.73
FANG:
0.15
CWCO:
-1.03
FANG:
0.42
CWCO:
26.15%
FANG:
9.21%
CWCO:
34.09%
FANG:
28.20%
CWCO:
-81.47%
FANG:
-88.72%
CWCO:
-32.97%
FANG:
-25.29%
Fundamentals
CWCO:
$411.71M
FANG:
$46.76B
CWCO:
$1.66
FANG:
$17.33
CWCO:
15.66
FANG:
9.24
CWCO:
2.24
FANG:
1.20
CWCO:
$158.81M
FANG:
$9.57B
CWCO:
$56.42M
FANG:
$6.02B
CWCO:
$38.36M
FANG:
$6.66B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWCO achieves a -29.08% return, which is significantly lower than FANG's 4.36% return. Over the past 10 years, CWCO has underperformed FANG with an annualized return of 11.45%, while FANG has yielded a comparatively higher 12.21% annualized return.
CWCO
-29.08%
-5.24%
0.44%
-27.52%
10.96%
11.45%
FANG
4.36%
-14.61%
-17.44%
3.57%
17.01%
12.21%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CWCO vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CWCO vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison
CWCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than FANG's 5.35% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWCO Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. | 1.58% | 1.01% | 2.30% | 3.20% | 2.82% | 2.09% | 3.64% | 1.79% | 2.76% | 2.45% | 2.81% | 2.13% |
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 5.35% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CWCO vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWCO drawdown since its inception was -81.47%, smaller than the maximum FANG drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWCO and FANG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CWCO vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison
Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) has a higher volatility of 9.15% compared to Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) at 7.53%. This indicates that CWCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CWCO vs. FANG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities