PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CWCO vs. FANG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CWCOFANG
YTD Return-28.65%22.14%
1Y Return-26.44%21.58%
3Y Return (Ann)33.16%24.76%
5Y Return (Ann)12.12%24.03%
10Y Return (Ann)9.90%12.92%
Sharpe Ratio-0.700.79
Sortino Ratio-0.851.24
Omega Ratio0.901.16
Calmar Ratio-0.661.13
Martin Ratio-0.922.99
Ulcer Index25.98%7.22%
Daily Std Dev34.46%27.32%
Max Drawdown-81.47%-88.72%
Current Drawdown-32.57%-12.56%

Fundamentals


CWCOFANG
Market Cap$400.30M$52.53B
EPS$1.90$17.33
PE Ratio13.3110.38
PEG Ratio2.191.20
Total Revenue (TTM)$125.42M$9.57B
Gross Profit (TTM)$44.79M$6.02B
EBITDA (TTM)$29.82M$6.51B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between CWCO and FANG is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CWCO vs. FANG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CWCO achieves a -28.65% return, which is significantly lower than FANG's 22.14% return. Over the past 10 years, CWCO has underperformed FANG with an annualized return of 9.90%, while FANG has yielded a comparatively higher 12.92% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-12.29%
-6.25%
CWCO
FANG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CWCO vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CWCO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CWCO, currently valued at -0.77, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.77
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CWCO, currently valued at -0.97, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.97
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CWCO, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.89
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CWCO, currently valued at -0.72, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.72
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CWCO, currently valued at -1.01, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-1.01
FANG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FANG, currently valued at 0.79, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.79
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FANG, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.24
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FANG, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.16
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FANG, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.13
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FANG, currently valued at 2.99, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.99

CWCO vs. FANG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWCO Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the FANG Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWCO and FANG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.77
0.79
CWCO
FANG

Dividends

CWCO vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison

CWCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than FANG's 6.40% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CWCO
Consolidated Water Co. Ltd.
1.57%1.01%2.30%3.20%2.82%2.09%3.64%1.79%2.76%2.45%2.81%2.13%
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
6.40%5.15%6.55%1.62%3.10%0.74%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CWCO vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWCO drawdown since its inception was -81.47%, smaller than the maximum FANG drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWCO and FANG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-32.57%
-12.56%
CWCO
FANG

Volatility

CWCO vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison

Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) have volatilities of 8.10% and 7.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.10%
7.82%
CWCO
FANG

Financials

CWCO vs. FANG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items