PortfoliosLab logo
CWBFX vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CWBFX and VOO is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CWBFX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Capital World Bond Fund (CWBFX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CWBFX:

1.08

VOO:

0.74

Sortino Ratio

CWBFX:

1.53

VOO:

1.04

Omega Ratio

CWBFX:

1.18

VOO:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

CWBFX:

0.28

VOO:

0.68

Martin Ratio

CWBFX:

1.77

VOO:

2.58

Ulcer Index

CWBFX:

3.38%

VOO:

4.93%

Daily Std Dev

CWBFX:

5.90%

VOO:

19.54%

Max Drawdown

CWBFX:

-27.91%

VOO:

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

CWBFX:

-15.63%

VOO:

-3.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWBFX achieves a 5.65% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, CWBFX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 0.56%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.81% annualized return.


CWBFX

YTD

5.65%

1M

0.18%

6M

2.84%

1Y

6.06%

3Y*

0.77%

5Y*

-1.62%

10Y*

0.56%

VOO

YTD

0.90%

1M

5.53%

6M

-1.46%

1Y

13.29%

3Y*

14.31%

5Y*

15.89%

10Y*

12.81%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

CWBFX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWBFX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CWBFX vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWBFX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CWBFX is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CWBFX is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CWBFX is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CWBFX is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CWBFX is 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CWBFX is 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VOO is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VOO is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VOO is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VOO is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VOO is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VOO is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CWBFX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Capital World Bond Fund (CWBFX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CWBFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWBFX and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CWBFX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

CWBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, more than VOO's 1.29% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CWBFX
American Funds Capital World Bond Fund
3.05%3.01%2.47%1.99%2.63%3.18%2.26%2.16%1.80%2.05%0.58%2.95%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.29%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%

Drawdowns

CWBFX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWBFX drawdown since its inception was -27.91%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWBFX and VOO.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CWBFX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Capital World Bond Fund (CWBFX) is 1.88%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that CWBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...