CWB vs. GLD

In the year-to-date period, CWB achieves a 4.49% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's 23.09% return. Over the past 10 years, CWB has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of 8.97%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 9.93% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Both CWB and GLD have an expense ratio of 0.40%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB) and SPDR Gold Trust (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CWB Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWB and GLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum CWB drawdown since its inception was -32.06%, smaller than the maximum GLD drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWB and GLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB) is 2.83%, while SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) has a volatility of 8.55%. This indicates that CWB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.