CW vs. ETN
CW (Curtiss-Wright Corporation) and ETN (Eaton Corporation plc) are both stocks. Both operate in the Specialty Industrial Machinery industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, CW returned 24.02%/yr vs 23.40%/yr for ETN. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CW vs. ETN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CW having a 31.42% return and ETN slightly lower at 31.12%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CW having a 24.02% annualized return and ETN not far behind at 23.40%.
CW
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- -4.77%
- 6M
- 10.33%
- YTD
- 31.42%
- 1Y
- 46.91%
- 3Y*
- 56.37%
- 5Y*
- 44.17%
- 10Y*
- 24.02%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.26%
ETN
- 1D
- 7.32%
- 1M
- 4.19%
- 6M
- 18.85%
- YTD
- 31.12%
- 1Y
- 10.15%
- 3Y*
- 25.38%
- 5Y*
- 23.26%
- 10Y*
- 23.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $151.67M | $160.90M | $206.01M | |
| $1.04B | $939.19M | $1.06B |
CW vs. ETN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 31.42% | 55.66% | 59.73% | 33.98% | 21.03% | 19.86% | -16.83% | 38.70% | -15.79% | 24.56% |
ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 31.12% | -2.79% | 39.51% | 56.22% | -7.18% | 46.70% | 29.88% | 42.76% | -10.04% | 21.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between CW and ETN is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987 | 0.42 |
The correlation between CW and ETN shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.57 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CW:
$26.75B
ETN:
$161.22B
CW:
$13.69
ETN:
$9.83
CW:
52.89
ETN:
42.23
CW:
2.89
ETN:
2.29
CW:
7.50
ETN:
5.39
CW:
10.19
ETN:
7.98
CW:
$3.61B
ETN:
$30.03B
CW:
$1.34B
ETN:
$10.78B
CW:
$745.31M
ETN:
$6.06B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CW vs. ETN — Risk / Return Rank
CW
ETN
CW vs. ETN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CW | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.07 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 0.50 | +2.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.71 | 1.07 | +8.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CW vs. ETN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CW drawdown since its inception was -59.19%, smaller than the maximum ETN drawdown of -68.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CW and ETN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CW | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.19% | -68.95% | +9.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.30% | -18.33% | +4.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.21% | -34.46% | +7.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.21% | -34.46% | +7.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.73% | -44.55% | -4.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.67% | -4.72% | -3.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.86% | -14.87% | +1.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.95% | 8.63% | -3.68% |
Volatility
CW vs. ETN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) is 12.78%, while Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) has a volatility of 15.81%. This indicates that CW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CW | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.78% | 15.81% | -3.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.31% | 31.45% | -4.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.97% | 37.69% | -2.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.23% | 31.33% | -3.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.49% | 30.53% | -0.04% |
Dividends
CW vs. ETN - Dividend Comparison
CW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than ETN's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.51% | 0.58% | 0.47% | 0.59% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.76% |
ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 1.03% | 1.31% | 1.13% | 1.43% | 2.06% | 1.76% | 1.88% | 3.00% | 3.85% | 3.04% | 3.40% | 4.23% |
Financials
CW vs. ETN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Eaton Corporation plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CW vs. ETN - Profitability Comparison
CW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a gross profit of 331.48M and revenue of 913.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.3%.
ETN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported a gross profit of 2.86B and revenue of 8.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.5%.
CW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported an operating income of 160.42M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.
ETN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported an operating income of 1.39B and revenue of 8.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.
CW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a net income of 128.19M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.
ETN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported a net income of 821.00M and revenue of 8.53B, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CW and ETN have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETN has higher volatility (15.81%) compared to CW (12.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CW dropped -59.19% vs ETN's -68.95%.
CW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CW and ETN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer