PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVX vs. FANG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CVX vs. FANG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chevron Corporation (CVX) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVX achieves a 25.93% return, which is significantly lower than FANG's 36.55% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CVX having a 11.02% annualized return and FANG not far ahead at 11.32%.


CVX

1D
-0.72%
1M
-1.33%
YTD
25.93%
6M
26.06%
1Y
42.85%
3Y*
11.18%
5Y*
16.35%
10Y*
11.02%

FANG

1D
-3.63%
1M
-1.03%
YTD
36.55%
6M
28.69%
1Y
49.39%
3Y*
20.24%
5Y*
23.93%
10Y*
11.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVX vs. FANG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CVX
Chevron Corporation
25.93%10.10%1.29%-13.63%58.46%46.24%-25.95%15.27%-9.75%10.59%
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
36.55%-5.64%10.35%19.66%35.34%127.51%-46.00%0.92%-26.35%24.93%

Correlation

The correlation between CVX and FANG is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2012

0.64

The correlation between CVX and FANG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CVX:

$374.04B

FANG:

$57.39B

EPS

CVX:

$5.75

FANG:

$1.40

PE Ratio

CVX:

32.73

FANG:

144.83

PS Ratio

CVX:

1.94

FANG:

3.84

PB Ratio

CVX:

2.04

FANG:

1.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

CVX:

$185.89B

FANG:

$15.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CVX:

$47.27B

FANG:

$7.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

CVX:

$40.44B

FANG:

$5.54B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVX vs. FANG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVX
CVX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
CVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FANG
FANG Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FANG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FANG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FANG Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FANG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FANG Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVX vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chevron Corporation (CVX) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVXFANGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.26

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

3.96

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.88

7.88

0.00

CVX vs. FANG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the FANG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVX and FANG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CVXFANGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

1.60

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.63

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.23

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.47

-0.09

Drawdowns

CVX vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVX drawdown since its inception was -55.77%, smaller than the maximum FANG drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVX and FANG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVXFANGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.77%

-88.72%

+32.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.99%

-12.53%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.64%

-42.10%

+21.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.95%

-42.10%

+17.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.77%

-88.72%

+32.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.98%

-4.51%

-5.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.39%

-19.39%

+8.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.46%

6.29%

-0.83%

Volatility

CVX vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Chevron Corporation (CVX) is 8.31%, while Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has a volatility of 11.44%. This indicates that CVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVXFANGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.31%

11.44%

-3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.76%

23.14%

-5.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.09%

31.07%

-8.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.12%

37.92%

-12.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.15%

49.03%

-19.88%

Dividends

CVX vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison

CVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, more than FANG's 2.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVX
Chevron Corporation
3.71%4.49%4.50%4.05%3.16%4.52%6.11%3.95%4.12%3.45%3.64%4.76%
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
2.04%2.66%5.06%5.15%6.55%1.62%3.10%0.74%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CVX vs. FANG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chevron Corporation and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B70.00B20222023202420252026
47.56B
4.24B
(CVX) Total Revenue
(FANG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CVX vs. FANG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Chevron Corporation and Diamondback Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
9.6%
90.9%
Portfolio components
CVX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chevron Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.55B and revenue of 47.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.6%.

FANG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.85B and revenue of 4.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 90.9%.

CVX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chevron Corporation reported an operating income of 3.24B and revenue of 47.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.

FANG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 30.00M and revenue of 4.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.7%.

CVX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chevron Corporation reported a net income of 2.21B and revenue of 47.56B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.

FANG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 144.00M and revenue of 4.24B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CVX and FANG have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FANG has higher volatility (11.44%) compared to CVX (8.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVX dropped -55.77% vs FANG's -88.72%.

CVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVX and FANG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer