PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVS vs. XLB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVS vs. XLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CVS Health Corporation (CVS) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVS achieves a 29.83% return, which is significantly higher than XLB's 14.76% return. Over the past 10 years, CVS has underperformed XLB with an annualized return of 3.94%, while XLB has yielded a comparatively higher 10.60% annualized return.


CVS

1D
3.03%
1M
8.62%
YTD
29.83%
6M
31.48%
1Y
57.74%
3Y*
17.81%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
3.94%

XLB

1D
0.01%
1M
3.03%
YTD
14.76%
6M
13.96%
1Y
22.26%
3Y*
11.14%
5Y*
6.85%
10Y*
10.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVS vs. XLB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CVS
CVS Health Corporation
29.83%84.35%-40.77%-12.53%-7.63%54.87%-5.14%17.26%-7.04%-5.75%
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
14.76%9.94%0.15%12.46%-12.30%27.44%20.46%24.13%-14.88%24.01%

Correlation

The correlation between CVS and XLB is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998

0.38

The correlation between CVS and XLB shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.38 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVS vs. XLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVS
CVS Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
CVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVS Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

XLB
XLB Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
XLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLB Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
XLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLB Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVS vs. XLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CVS Health Corporation (CVS) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CVSXLBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.22

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

1.81

+1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.08

5.51

+3.56

CVS vs. XLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVS Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the XLB Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVS and XLB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CVS vs. XLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVS drawdown since its inception was -64.07%, which is greater than XLB's maximum drawdown of -59.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVS and XLB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVSXLBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.07%

-59.83%

-4.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.44%

-12.38%

-4.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.98%

-23.17%

-20.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.79%

-24.72%

-32.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.79%

-37.27%

-19.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-2.94%

+2.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.53%

-10.82%

-8.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.38%

4.05%

+2.33%

Volatility

CVS vs. XLB - Volatility Comparison

CVS Health Corporation (CVS) has a higher volatility of 7.77% compared to Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) at 5.94%. This indicates that CVS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVSXLBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.77%

5.94%

+1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.91%

13.55%

+12.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.27%

17.48%

+13.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.01%

19.01%

+11.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.34%

20.71%

+8.63%

Dividends

CVS vs. XLB - Dividend Comparison

CVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, more than XLB's 2.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVS
CVS Health Corporation
2.63%3.35%5.93%3.06%2.36%1.94%2.93%2.69%3.05%2.76%2.15%1.43%
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.07%1.92%1.92%2.00%2.26%1.62%1.72%1.98%2.20%1.66%1.95%2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


CVS and XLB have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CVS has higher volatility (7.77%) compared to XLB (5.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVS dropped -64.07% vs XLB's -59.83%.

CVS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVS and XLB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer