PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CVRT vs. FLJH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CVRT and FLJH is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

CVRT vs. FLJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
17.36%
2.18%
CVRT
FLJH

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CVRT:

1.11

FLJH:

1.30

Sortino Ratio

CVRT:

1.57

FLJH:

1.70

Omega Ratio

CVRT:

1.19

FLJH:

1.25

Calmar Ratio

CVRT:

1.92

FLJH:

1.25

Martin Ratio

CVRT:

5.82

FLJH:

4.34

Ulcer Index

CVRT:

3.10%

FLJH:

5.86%

Daily Std Dev

CVRT:

16.26%

FLJH:

19.58%

Max Drawdown

CVRT:

-9.42%

FLJH:

-31.36%

Current Drawdown

CVRT:

-5.11%

FLJH:

-5.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVRT achieves a 16.74% return, which is significantly lower than FLJH's 23.28% return.


CVRT

YTD

16.74%

1M

-3.43%

6M

17.39%

1Y

16.68%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FLJH

YTD

23.28%

1M

0.87%

6M

3.12%

1Y

24.65%

5Y*

15.48%

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CVRT vs. FLJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVRT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FLJH's 0.09% expense ratio.


CVRT
Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF
Expense ratio chart for CVRT: current value at 0.69% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.69%
Expense ratio chart for FLJH: current value at 0.09% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.09%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CVRT vs. FLJH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CVRT, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.111.30
The chart of Sortino ratio for CVRT, currently valued at 1.57, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.001.571.70
The chart of Omega ratio for CVRT, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.191.25
The chart of Calmar ratio for CVRT, currently valued at 1.92, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.921.25
The chart of Martin ratio for CVRT, currently valued at 5.82, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.005.824.34
CVRT
FLJH

The current CVRT Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the FLJH Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVRT and FLJH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.00Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27Nov 03Nov 10Nov 17Nov 24DecemberDec 08Dec 15
1.11
1.30
CVRT
FLJH

Dividends

CVRT vs. FLJH - Dividend Comparison

CVRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than FLJH's 5.17% yield.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017
CVRT
Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF
1.35%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
5.17%25.59%26.67%1.29%0.00%0.00%5.92%0.05%

Drawdowns

CVRT vs. FLJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVRT drawdown since its inception was -9.42%, smaller than the maximum FLJH drawdown of -31.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVRT and FLJH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-5.11%
-5.36%
CVRT
FLJH

Volatility

CVRT vs. FLJH - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) at 4.88%. This indicates that CVRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
5.21%
4.88%
CVRT
FLJH
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab