CVRT vs. FLJH

In the year-to-date period, CVRT achieves a 1.28% return, which is significantly lower than FLJH's 3.03% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CVRT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FLJH's 0.09% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CVRT Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is higher than the FLJH Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVRT and FLJH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CVRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, while FLJH has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum CVRT drawdown since its inception was -25.08%, smaller than the maximum FLJH drawdown of -31.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVRT and FLJH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) has a higher volatility of 16.27% compared to Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) at 5.64%. This indicates that CVRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.