CVR vs. RTH
CVR (Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.) is a stock, while RTH (VanEck Vectors Retail ETF) is Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, CVR returned -7.23%/yr vs 13.75%/yr for RTH. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CVR vs. RTH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVR achieves a -28.32% return, which is significantly lower than RTH's 3.83% return. Over the past 10 years, CVR has underperformed RTH with an annualized return of -7.23%, while RTH has yielded a comparatively higher 13.75% annualized return.
CVR
- 1D
- -4.33%
- 1M
- -2.36%
- 6M
- -31.05%
- YTD
- -28.32%
- 1Y
- -17.24%
- 3Y*
- -25.49%
- 5Y*
- -16.35%
- 10Y*
- -7.23%
RTH
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- 6M
- -1.75%
- YTD
- 3.83%
- 1Y
- 9.59%
- 3Y*
- 14.70%
- 5Y*
- 8.83%
- 10Y*
- 13.75%
CVR vs. RTH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVR Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. | -28.32% | -11.27% | -4.80% | -39.01% | 12.53% | 18.81% | -9.31% | -14.62% | 2.63% | -21.14% |
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 3.83% | 12.36% | 20.02% | 20.07% | -17.67% | 24.94% | 31.62% | 29.06% | 3.87% | 22.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVR and RTH is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2001 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVR vs. RTH — Risk / Return Rank
CVR
RTH
CVR vs. RTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. (CVR) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CVR | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.14 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 1.23 | -1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.80 | 3.58 | -4.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CVR vs. RTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVR drawdown since its inception was -77.33%, which is greater than RTH's maximum drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVR and RTH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVR | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.33% | -42.32% | -35.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.06% | -7.83% | -27.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.58% | -13.80% | -52.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.66% | -25.00% | -45.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.33% | -25.00% | -52.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.63% | -4.05% | -69.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.91% | -7.33% | -26.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.61% | 2.68% | +18.93% |
Volatility
CVR vs. RTH - Volatility Comparison
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. (CVR) has a higher volatility of 12.47% compared to VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) at 4.48%. This indicates that CVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVR | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.47% | 4.48% | +7.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.35% | 9.82% | +31.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.87% | 12.52% | +46.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.63% | 16.88% | +28.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.68% | 17.57% | +24.11% |
Dividends
CVR vs. RTH - Dividend Comparison
CVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than RTH's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVR Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. | 0.90% | 0.86% | 2.08% | 3.77% | 3.07% | 3.35% | 2.27% | 4.57% | 3.62% | 3.62% | 1.95% | 5.26% |
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 0.93% | 0.97% | 0.77% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 0.78% | 0.64% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.56% | 1.84% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CVR and RTH have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CVR has higher volatility (12.47%) compared to RTH (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVR dropped -77.33% vs RTH's -42.32%.
RTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CVR and RTH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer