CVR vs. RTH
Compare and contrast key facts about Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. (CVR) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH).
RTH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CVR or RTH.
Correlation
The correlation between CVR and RTH is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CVR vs. RTH - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CVR:
-0.26
RTH:
1.46
CVR:
-0.08
RTH:
2.07
CVR:
0.99
RTH:
1.26
CVR:
-0.18
RTH:
2.39
CVR:
-0.87
RTH:
5.66
CVR:
13.52%
RTH:
3.23%
CVR:
44.88%
RTH:
12.50%
CVR:
-66.92%
RTH:
-41.80%
CVR:
-61.28%
RTH:
-3.91%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVR achieves a -6.63% return, which is significantly lower than RTH's 3.87% return. Over the past 10 years, CVR has underperformed RTH with an annualized return of -5.50%, while RTH has yielded a comparatively higher 13.19% annualized return.
CVR
-6.63%
-4.58%
-23.95%
-5.07%
-7.44%
-5.50%
RTH
3.87%
-0.65%
11.57%
16.07%
14.10%
13.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CVR vs. RTH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CVR
RTH
CVR vs. RTH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. (CVR) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CVR vs. RTH - Dividend Comparison
CVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than RTH's 0.74% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVR Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. | 2.23% | 2.08% | 3.77% | 3.07% | 3.35% | 2.27% | 4.57% | 3.62% | 3.62% | 2.38% | 4.19% | 3.64% |
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 0.74% | 0.77% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 0.78% | 0.64% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.56% | 1.84% | 2.25% | 0.41% |
Drawdowns
CVR vs. RTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVR drawdown since its inception was -66.92%, which is greater than RTH's maximum drawdown of -41.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVR and RTH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CVR vs. RTH - Volatility Comparison
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. (CVR) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) at 4.01%. This indicates that CVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.