CVR vs. RTH
CVR (Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.) is a stock, while RTH (VanEck Retail ETF) is Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, CVR returned -6.76%/yr vs 14.18%/yr for RTH. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CVR vs. RTH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVR achieves a -25.08% return, which is significantly lower than RTH's 9.18% return. Over the past 10 years, CVR has underperformed RTH with an annualized return of -6.76%, while RTH has yielded a comparatively higher 14.18% annualized return.
CVR
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- 6M
- -17.88%
- YTD
- -25.08%
- 1Y
- -17.38%
- 3Y*
- -24.24%
- 5Y*
- -15.51%
- 10Y*
- -6.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.32%
RTH
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- 6M
- 2.74%
- YTD
- 9.18%
- 1Y
- 15.46%
- 3Y*
- 16.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.06%
- 10Y*
- 14.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.92%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $27.10K | $25.93K | $38.63K | |
| $1.37M | $1.21M | $1.30M |
CVR vs. RTH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVR Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. | -25.08% | -11.27% | -4.80% | -39.01% | 12.53% | 18.81% | -9.31% | -14.62% | 2.63% | -21.14% |
RTH VanEck Retail ETF | 9.18% | 12.36% | 20.02% | 20.07% | -17.67% | 24.94% | 31.62% | 29.06% | 3.87% | 22.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVR and RTH is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2001 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVR vs. RTH — Risk / Return Rank
CVR
RTH
CVR vs. RTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. (CVR) and VanEck Retail ETF (RTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CVR | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.21 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | 1.98 | -2.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | 5.47 | -6.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CVR vs. RTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVR drawdown since its inception was -77.33%, which is greater than RTH's maximum drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVR and RTH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVR | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.33% | -42.32% | -35.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.06% | -7.83% | -27.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.53% | -13.80% | -51.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.66% | -25.00% | -45.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.33% | -25.00% | -52.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.44% | 0.00% | -72.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.98% | -7.32% | -26.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.78% | 2.83% | +19.95% |
Volatility
CVR vs. RTH - Volatility Comparison
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. (CVR) has a higher volatility of 11.49% compared to VanEck Retail ETF (RTH) at 5.25%. This indicates that CVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVR | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.49% | 5.25% | +6.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.46% | 10.65% | +29.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.87% | 13.33% | +45.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.76% | 16.97% | +28.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.74% | 17.63% | +24.11% |
Dividends
CVR vs. RTH - Dividend Comparison
CVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than RTH's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVR Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. | 0.87% | 0.86% | 2.08% | 3.77% | 3.07% | 3.35% | 2.27% | 4.57% | 3.62% | 3.62% | 1.95% | 5.26% |
RTH VanEck Retail ETF | 0.89% | 0.97% | 0.77% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 0.78% | 0.64% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.56% | 1.84% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CVR and RTH have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CVR has higher volatility (11.49%) compared to RTH (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVR dropped -77.33% vs RTH's -42.32%.
RTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CVR and RTH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer