CVLT vs. CLS

In the year-to-date period, CVLT achieves a 9.67% return, which is significantly higher than CLS's -3.52% return. Over the past 10 years, CVLT has underperformed CLS with an annualized return of 13.77%, while CLS has yielded a comparatively higher 22.06% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commvault Systems, Inc. (CVLT) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CVLT Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the CLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVLT and CLS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither CVLT nor CLS has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum CVLT drawdown since its inception was -68.89%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVLT and CLS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Commvault Systems, Inc. (CVLT) is 21.31%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 31.13%. This indicates that CVLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Commvault Systems, Inc. and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.