CVLT vs. CLS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Commvault Systems, Inc. (CVLT) and Celestica Inc. (CLS).

Performance

CVLT vs. CLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Commvault Systems, Inc. (CVLT) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CVLT vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CVLT Commvault Systems, Inc.	-37.87%	-16.93%	88.99%	27.07%	-8.82%	24.47%	24.04%	-24.45%	12.55%	2.14%
CLS Celestica Inc.	-4.71%	220.27%	215.23%	159.80%	1.26%	37.92%	-2.42%	-5.70%	-16.32%	-11.56%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CVLT : $3.47B CLS : $32.65B
EPS CVLT : $1.93 CLS : $7.19
PE Ratio CVLT : 40.31 CLS : 39.16
PEG Ratio CVLT : 0.09 CLS : 0.53
PS Ratio CVLT : 3.06 CLS : 2.63
PB Ratio CVLT : 16.03 CLS : 14.76
Total Revenue (TTM) CVLT : $1.15B CLS : $12.41B
Gross Profit (TTM) CVLT : $934.16M CLS : $1.44B
EBITDA (TTM) CVLT : $107.51M CLS : $1.21B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVLT achieves a -37.87% return, which is significantly lower than CLS's -4.71% return. Over the past 10 years, CVLT has underperformed CLS with an annualized return of 5.99%, while CLS has yielded a comparatively higher 38.34% annualized return.

CVLT

• 1D: 3.60%
• 1M: -8.45%
• YTD: -37.87%
• 6M: -58.74%
• 1Y: -50.63%
• 3Y*: 11.14%
• 5Y*: 3.33%
• 10Y*: 5.99%

CLS

• 1D: 9.49%
• 1M: 1.46%
• YTD: -4.71%
• 6M: 14.33%
• 1Y: 257.42%
• 3Y*: 179.50%
• 5Y*: 100.42%
• 10Y*: 38.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CVLT vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVLT

CVLT Risk / Return Rank: 8
CVLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
CVLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
CVLT Omega Ratio Rank: 7
CVLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
CVLT Martin Ratio Rank: 5

CLS

CLS Risk / Return Rank: 96
CLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CLS Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CLS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVLT vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commvault Systems, Inc. (CVLT) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CVLT	CLS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.90	3.61	-4.51
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.17	3.28	-4.45
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	1.44	-0.62
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.84	8.23	-9.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.71	21.92	-23.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CVLT vs. CLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVLT Sharpe Ratio is -0.90, which is lower than the CLS Sharpe Ratio of 3.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVLT and CLS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CVLT	CLS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.90	3.61	-4.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08	1.81	-1.73
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16	0.79	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.25	-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between CVLT and CLS is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CVLT vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison

Neither CVLT nor CLS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CVLT vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVLT drawdown since its inception was -68.89%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVLT and CLS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CVLT	CLS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.89%	-96.93%	+28.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.53%	-29.24%	-32.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.53%	-53.96%	-7.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.53%	-80.60%	+19.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-60.14%	-20.12%	-40.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.70%	-73.79%	+47.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.33%	10.98%	+19.35%

Volatility

CVLT vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Commvault Systems, Inc. (CVLT) is 11.75%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 23.87%. This indicates that CVLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CVLT	CLS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.75%	23.87%	-12.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	48.51%	54.95%	-6.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.43%	72.02%	-15.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.57%	55.73%	-14.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.17%	48.76%	-11.59%

Financials

CVLT vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Commvault Systems, Inc. and Celestica Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CVLT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Commvault Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 254.54M and revenue of 313.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.1%.

CLS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 427.57M and revenue of 3.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.

CVLT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Commvault Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 19.77M and revenue of 313.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.3%.

CLS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 325.73M and revenue of 3.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.

CVLT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Commvault Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 17.78M and revenue of 313.83M, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.

CLS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 271.61M and revenue of 3.71B, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.