PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CVLC vs. BDGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CVLCBDGS
YTD Return18.27%12.80%
1Y Return28.59%19.04%
Sharpe Ratio2.022.77
Daily Std Dev13.34%6.59%
Max Drawdown-11.30%-5.38%
Current Drawdown-0.79%-0.10%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between CVLC and BDGS is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

CVLC vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CVLC achieves a 18.27% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 12.80% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
8.85%
10.84%
CVLC
BDGS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CVLC vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVLC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.


BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
Expense ratio chart for BDGS: current value at 0.85% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.85%
Expense ratio chart for CVLC: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CVLC vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVLC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CVLC, currently valued at 2.02, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.02
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CVLC, currently valued at 2.71, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.71
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CVLC, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.36
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CVLC, currently valued at 2.39, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.39
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CVLC, currently valued at 10.25, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0010.25
BDGS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 2.77, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.77
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 4.61, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.61
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 1.82, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.82
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 3.40, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.40
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 20.36, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0020.36

CVLC vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVLC Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which roughly equals the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CVLC and BDGS.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.00May 19May 26Jun 02Jun 09Jun 16Jun 23Jun 30Jul 07Jul 14Jul 21Jul 28Aug 04Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25SeptemberSep 08Sep 15
2.02
2.77
CVLC
BDGS

Dividends

CVLC vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

CVLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than BDGS's 0.74% yield.


TTM2023
CVLC
Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
0.83%0.91%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
0.74%0.84%

Drawdowns

CVLC vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVLC drawdown since its inception was -11.30%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVLC and BDGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-0.79%
-0.10%
CVLC
BDGS

Volatility

CVLC vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 0.81%. This indicates that CVLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
4.31%
0.81%
CVLC
BDGS