PortfoliosLab logo
CVLC vs. BDGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CVLC and BDGS is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.8

Performance

CVLC vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%45.00%50.00%55.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
39.15%
29.39%
CVLC
BDGS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CVLC:

0.62

BDGS:

1.46

Sortino Ratio

CVLC:

0.99

BDGS:

2.32

Omega Ratio

CVLC:

1.14

BDGS:

1.43

Calmar Ratio

CVLC:

0.63

BDGS:

1.83

Martin Ratio

CVLC:

2.43

BDGS:

8.72

Ulcer Index

CVLC:

5.19%

BDGS:

1.92%

Daily Std Dev

CVLC:

20.32%

BDGS:

11.51%

Max Drawdown

CVLC:

-19.92%

BDGS:

-9.12%

Current Drawdown

CVLC:

-8.64%

BDGS:

-2.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVLC achieves a -4.72% return, which is significantly lower than BDGS's 0.33% return.


CVLC

YTD

-4.72%

1M

11.59%

6M

-1.44%

1Y

10.20%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BDGS

YTD

0.33%

1M

6.77%

6M

5.25%

1Y

16.09%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CVLC vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVLC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for BDGS: current value is 0.85%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
BDGS: 0.85%
Expense ratio chart for CVLC: current value is 0.15%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
CVLC: 0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CVLC vs. BDGS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVLC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CVLC is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CVLC is 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CVLC is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CVLC is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CVLC is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CVLC is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

BDGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BDGS is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BDGS is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CVLC vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for CVLC, currently valued at 0.62, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
CVLC: 0.62
BDGS: 1.46
The chart of Sortino ratio for CVLC, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
CVLC: 0.99
BDGS: 2.32
The chart of Omega ratio for CVLC, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
CVLC: 1.14
BDGS: 1.43
The chart of Calmar ratio for CVLC, currently valued at 0.63, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
CVLC: 0.63
BDGS: 1.83
The chart of Martin ratio for CVLC, currently valued at 2.43, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
CVLC: 2.43
BDGS: 8.72

The current CVLC Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVLC and BDGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.62
1.46
CVLC
BDGS

Dividends

CVLC vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

CVLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than BDGS's 1.80% yield.


Drawdowns

CVLC vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVLC drawdown since its inception was -19.92%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVLC and BDGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-8.64%
-2.32%
CVLC
BDGS

Volatility

CVLC vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) has a higher volatility of 13.49% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 8.59%. This indicates that CVLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
13.49%
8.59%
CVLC
BDGS