PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVI vs. SU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CVI vs. SU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CVR Energy, Inc. (CVI) and Suncor Energy Inc. (SU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVI achieves a 11.71% return, which is significantly lower than SU's 28.59% return. Over the past 10 years, CVI has outperformed SU with an annualized return of 19.62%, while SU has yielded a comparatively lower 12.24% annualized return.


CVI

1D
1.82%
1M
-14.02%
YTD
11.71%
6M
6.80%
1Y
3.30%
3Y*
10.95%
5Y*
27.36%
10Y*
19.62%

SU

1D
1.63%
1M
-15.94%
YTD
28.59%
6M
32.81%
1Y
44.95%
3Y*
30.95%
5Y*
23.12%
10Y*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVI vs. SU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CVI
CVR Energy, Inc.
11.71%51.83%-34.88%11.51%210.18%25.69%-61.31%25.44%-0.80%59.94%
SU
Suncor Energy Inc.
28.59%29.69%16.22%6.40%32.31%54.94%-46.67%22.10%-21.27%17.86%

Correlation

The correlation between CVI and SU is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2007

0.48

The correlation between CVI and SU shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CVI:

$2.80B

SU:

$66.86B

EPS

CVI:

-$0.42

SU:

CA$5.24

PS Ratio

CVI:

0.37

SU:

1.85

PB Ratio

CVI:

5.21

SU:

2.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

CVI:

$7.50B

SU:

CA$52.01B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CVI:

-$1.54B

SU:

CA$28.85B

EBITDA (TTM)

CVI:

$441.00M

SU:

CA$16.36B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVI vs. SU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVI
CVI Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
CVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVI Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
CVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVI Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

SU
SU Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SU Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
SU Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVI vs. SU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CVR Energy, Inc. (CVI) and Suncor Energy Inc. (SU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CVISUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.30

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

2.24

-2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.15

9.65

-9.50

CVI vs. SU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVI Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the SU Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVI and SU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CVI vs. SU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVI drawdown since its inception was -92.39%, which is greater than SU's maximum drawdown of -80.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVI and SU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVISUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.39%

-80.22%

-12.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.21%

-20.12%

-28.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.17%

-22.42%

-33.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.17%

-36.58%

-19.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.26%

-73.54%

-6.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.97%

-18.83%

-10.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.14%

-27.40%

-7.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.61%

4.78%

+17.83%

Volatility

CVI vs. SU - Volatility Comparison

CVR Energy, Inc. (CVI) has a higher volatility of 14.44% compared to Suncor Energy Inc. (SU) at 9.58%. This indicates that CVI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVISUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.44%

9.58%

+4.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.24%

20.33%

+20.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.10%

24.58%

+27.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.96%

32.89%

+25.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.15%

36.95%

+22.20%

Dividends

CVI vs. SU - Dividend Comparison

CVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than SU's 3.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVI
CVR Energy, Inc.
1.68%8.88%8.00%14.85%32.04%14.28%8.05%7.54%7.25%5.37%7.88%5.08%
SU
Suncor Energy Inc.
3.05%3.72%4.51%5.27%4.56%3.34%4.93%3.84%4.24%4.16%3.55%4.42%

Financials

CVI vs. SU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CVR Energy, Inc. and Suncor Energy Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
1.98B
15.42B
(CVI) Total Revenue
(SU) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CVI values in USD, SU values in CAD

Frequently Asked Questions


CVI and SU have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CVI has higher volatility (14.44%) compared to SU (9.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVI dropped -92.39% vs SU's -80.22%.

SU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVI and SU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer