CVI vs. IEP
CVI (CVR Energy, Inc.) and IEP (Icahn Enterprises L.P.) are both stocks. CVI operates in Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing (Energy), while IEP operates in Conglomerates (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CVI returned 19.31%/yr vs -4.01%/yr for IEP. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CVI vs. IEP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVI achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly lower than IEP's 9.44% return. Over the past 10 years, CVI has outperformed IEP with an annualized return of 19.31%, while IEP has yielded a comparatively lower -4.01% annualized return.
CVI
- 1D
- -2.51%
- 1M
- -16.18%
- YTD
- 8.91%
- 6M
- 5.38%
- 1Y
- 2.99%
- 3Y*
- 10.02%
- 5Y*
- 26.88%
- 10Y*
- 19.31%
IEP
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -3.58%
- YTD
- 9.44%
- 6M
- 13.97%
- 1Y
- 13.57%
- 3Y*
- -20.18%
- 5Y*
- -19.40%
- 10Y*
- -4.01%
CVI vs. IEP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVI CVR Energy, Inc. | 8.91% | 51.83% | -34.88% | 11.51% | 210.18% | 25.69% | -61.31% | 25.44% | -0.80% | 59.94% |
IEP Icahn Enterprises L.P. | 9.44% | 8.23% | -37.79% | -58.78% | 18.76% | 12.87% | -3.55% | 20.44% | 18.98% | -1.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVI and IEP is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2007 | 0.28 |
Fundamentals
CVI:
-$0.42
IEP:
-$1.15
CVI:
0.36
IEP:
0.30
CVI:
$7.50B
IEP:
$10.18B
CVI:
-$1.54B
IEP:
$1.33B
CVI:
$441.00M
IEP:
$1.17B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVI vs. IEP — Risk / Return Rank
CVI
IEP
CVI vs. IEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CVR Energy, Inc. (CVI) and Icahn Enterprises L.P. (IEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CVI | IEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.12 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.06 | 0.85 | -0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.13 | 1.80 | -1.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CVI vs. IEP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVI drawdown since its inception was -92.39%, which is greater than IEP's maximum drawdown of -84.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVI and IEP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVI | IEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.39% | -84.21% | -8.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.21% | -16.06% | -32.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.17% | -67.83% | +11.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.17% | -77.56% | +21.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.26% | -77.56% | -2.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.75% | -71.95% | +41.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.14% | -30.62% | -4.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.69% | 7.56% | +15.13% |
Volatility
CVI vs. IEP - Volatility Comparison
CVR Energy, Inc. (CVI) has a higher volatility of 13.89% compared to Icahn Enterprises L.P. (IEP) at 4.89%. This indicates that CVI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVI | IEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.89% | 4.89% | +9.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.12% | 16.08% | +25.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.06% | 25.08% | +26.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.98% | 41.02% | +16.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.14% | 36.35% | +22.79% |
Dividends
CVI vs. IEP - Dividend Comparison
CVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than IEP's 27.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVI CVR Energy, Inc. | 1.73% | 8.88% | 8.00% | 14.85% | 32.04% | 14.28% | 8.05% | 7.54% | 7.25% | 5.37% | 7.88% | 5.08% |
IEP Icahn Enterprises L.P. | 27.47% | 26.49% | 40.37% | 34.90% | 15.79% | 16.13% | 15.79% | 13.01% | 12.26% | 11.32% | 10.01% | 9.79% |
Financials
CVI vs. IEP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CVR Energy, Inc. and Icahn Enterprises L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CVI and IEP have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CVI has higher volatility (13.89%) compared to IEP (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVI dropped -92.39% vs IEP's -84.21%.
IEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CVI and IEP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer