PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVGRX vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVGRX vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Growth Fund (CVGRX) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CVGRX having a 11.13% return and ITOT slightly higher at 11.25%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CVGRX having a 14.85% annualized return and ITOT not far ahead at 15.01%.


CVGRX

1D
-0.11%
1M
6.96%
YTD
11.13%
6M
10.25%
1Y
28.10%
3Y*
24.26%
5Y*
12.77%
10Y*
14.85%

ITOT

1D
-0.73%
1M
5.01%
YTD
11.25%
6M
11.12%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
22.09%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVGRX vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CVGRX
Calamos Growth Fund
11.13%16.08%32.32%37.64%-33.33%23.06%32.97%31.11%-6.14%26.58%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
11.25%17.00%23.80%26.12%-19.47%25.68%20.71%30.67%-5.33%21.37%

Correlation

The correlation between CVGRX and ITOT is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2004

0.91

The correlation between CVGRX and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVGRX vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVGRX
CVGRX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
CVGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
CVGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVGRX vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Growth Fund (CVGRX) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVGRXITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.42

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

3.17

-1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.76

14.57

-7.81

CVGRX vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVGRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVGRX and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CVGRXITOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

2.32

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.74

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.82

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.57

-0.06

Drawdowns

CVGRX vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVGRX drawdown since its inception was -61.65%, which is greater than ITOT's maximum drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVGRX and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVGRXITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.65%

-55.20%

-6.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.00%

-8.90%

-7.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.81%

-19.44%

-4.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.43%

-25.36%

-12.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.43%

-35.00%

-2.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.73%

+0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.50%

-6.97%

-4.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.26%

1.94%

+2.32%

Volatility

CVGRX vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Growth Fund (CVGRX) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 2.99%. This indicates that CVGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVGRXITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.69%

2.99%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.71%

9.13%

+3.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.48%

12.20%

+4.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.81%

17.36%

+4.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.61%

18.26%

+3.35%

CVGRX vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVGRX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

CVGRX vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

CVGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.93%, more than ITOT's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVGRX
Calamos Growth Fund
7.93%8.81%6.66%4.48%0.00%12.17%11.25%9.71%16.86%13.75%4.12%35.24%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
0.98%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, CVGRX and ITOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CVGRX has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to ITOT (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVGRX dropped -61.65% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVGRX and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer