CVGRX vs. FSPTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Calamos Growth Fund (CVGRX) and Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio (FSPTX).
CVGRX is managed by Calamos. It was launched on Sep 4, 1990. FSPTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 13, 1981.
Performance
CVGRX vs. FSPTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CVGRX vs. FSPTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVGRX Calamos Growth Fund | -10.05% | 16.08% | 32.32% | 37.64% | -33.33% | 23.06% | 32.97% | 31.11% | -6.14% | 26.58% |
FSPTX Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio | -4.01% | 23.37% | 41.76% | 59.83% | -36.91% | 21.99% | 63.95% | 51.08% | -9.03% | 49.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVGRX achieves a -10.05% return, which is significantly lower than FSPTX's -4.01% return. Over the past 10 years, CVGRX has underperformed FSPTX with an annualized return of 12.57%, while FSPTX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.84% annualized return.
CVGRX
- 1D
- 4.19%
- 1M
- -5.84%
- YTD
- -10.05%
- 6M
- -8.90%
- 1Y
- 15.95%
- 3Y*
- 19.12%
- 5Y*
- 8.26%
- 10Y*
- 12.57%
FSPTX
- 1D
- 4.99%
- 1M
- -3.56%
- YTD
- -4.01%
- 6M
- -3.00%
- 1Y
- 36.58%
- 3Y*
- 28.77%
- 5Y*
- 14.60%
- 10Y*
- 22.84%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CVGRX vs. FSPTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVGRX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPTX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CVGRX vs. FSPTX — Risk / Return Rank
CVGRX
FSPTX
CVGRX vs. FSPTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Growth Fund (CVGRX) and Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio (FSPTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CVGRX | FSPTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | 1.30 | -0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.23 | 1.94 | -0.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.27 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 2.43 | -1.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.97 | 8.36 | -4.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CVGRX | FSPTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 1.30 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.54 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.89 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.53 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between CVGRX and FSPTX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CVGRX vs. FSPTX - Dividend Comparison
CVGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.80%, more than FSPTX's 9.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVGRX Calamos Growth Fund | 9.80% | 8.81% | 6.66% | 4.48% | 0.00% | 12.17% | 11.25% | 9.71% | 16.86% | 13.75% | 4.12% | 35.24% |
FSPTX Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio | 9.44% | 9.06% | 9.42% | 0.01% | 3.95% | 11.62% | 18.86% | 1.86% | 23.77% | 8.32% | 1.54% | 4.19% |
Drawdowns
CVGRX vs. FSPTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVGRX drawdown since its inception was -61.65%, smaller than the maximum FSPTX drawdown of -84.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVGRX and FSPTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVGRX | FSPTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.65% | -84.37% | +22.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.00% | -15.49% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.43% | -42.16% | +4.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.43% | -42.16% | +4.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.48% | -9.41% | -3.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.55% | -27.13% | +15.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.25% | 4.51% | -0.26% |
Volatility
CVGRX vs. FSPTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calamos Growth Fund (CVGRX) is 7.78%, while Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio (FSPTX) has a volatility of 8.46%. This indicates that CVGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CVGRX | FSPTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.78% | 8.46% | -0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.33% | 17.22% | -3.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.72% | 29.39% | -6.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.87% | 27.27% | -5.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.54% | 25.85% | -4.31% |