PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVEO vs. RGP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CVEO vs. RGP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Civeo Corporation (CVEO) and Resources Connection, Inc. (RGP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVEO achieves a 52.03% return, which is significantly higher than RGP's -4.75% return. Over the past 10 years, CVEO has outperformed RGP with an annualized return of 4.59%, while RGP has yielded a comparatively lower -7.49% annualized return.


CVEO

1D
0.09%
1M
11.41%
YTD
52.03%
6M
58.77%
1Y
60.75%
3Y*
20.56%
5Y*
16.25%
10Y*
4.59%

RGP

1D
-1.07%
1M
7.39%
YTD
-4.75%
6M
0.64%
1Y
-2.37%
3Y*
-30.29%
5Y*
-16.80%
10Y*
-7.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVEO vs. RGP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CVEO
Civeo Corporation
52.03%1.59%3.58%-24.85%62.23%37.91%-10.21%-9.79%-47.62%24.09%
RGP
Resources Connection, Inc.
-4.75%-37.28%-36.50%-20.09%6.25%47.30%-19.45%18.95%-5.11%-17.11%

Correlation

The correlation between CVEO and RGP is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2014

0.25

Fundamentals

EPS

CVEO:

-$1.48

RGP:

-$2.95

PS Ratio

CVEO:

0.49

RGP:

0.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

CVEO:

$667.47M

RGP:

$485.23M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CVEO:

$49.04M

RGP:

$185.73M

EBITDA (TTM)

CVEO:

$73.11M

RGP:

-$12.52M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVEO vs. RGP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVEO
CVEO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
CVEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVEO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CVEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVEO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

RGP
RGP Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
RGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGP Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
RGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGP Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVEO vs. RGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Civeo Corporation (CVEO) and Resources Connection, Inc. (RGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVEORGPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.94

-0.05

+1.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.65

0.25

+2.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.03

+0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

-0.10

+3.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.28

-0.17

+8.45

CVEO vs. RGP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the RGP Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVEO and RGP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CVEORGPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

-0.05

+1.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

-0.44

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

-0.20

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.22

-0.15

-0.07

Drawdowns

CVEO vs. RGP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVEO drawdown since its inception was -98.72%, which is greater than RGP's maximum drawdown of -83.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVEO and RGP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVEORGPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.72%

-83.07%

-15.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.41%

-39.75%

+19.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.24%

-76.59%

+43.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.41%

-81.12%

+30.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.28%

-81.12%

-11.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-88.68%

-76.96%

-11.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.32%

-46.85%

-42.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.18%

23.02%

-15.84%

Volatility

CVEO vs. RGP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Civeo Corporation (CVEO) is 11.63%, while Resources Connection, Inc. (RGP) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that CVEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVEORGPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.63%

12.61%

-0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.99%

30.76%

-10.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.50%

46.21%

-14.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.81%

38.75%

+1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.90%

37.63%

+23.27%

Dividends

CVEO vs. RGP - Dividend Comparison

CVEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RGP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.54%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVEO
Civeo Corporation
0.00%1.09%4.40%2.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RGP
Resources Connection, Inc.
7.54%6.94%6.57%3.95%3.05%3.14%4.46%3.31%3.52%2.98%2.18%2.20%

Financials

CVEO vs. RGP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Civeo Corporation and Resources Connection, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M120.00M140.00M160.00M180.00M200.00M220.00M20222023202420252026
172.67M
107.93M
(CVEO) Total Revenue
(RGP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CVEO vs. RGP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Civeo Corporation and Resources Connection, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%202220232024202520260
35.7%
Portfolio components
CVEO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Civeo Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 172.67M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

RGP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Resources Connection, Inc. reported a gross profit of 38.58M and revenue of 107.93M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.7%.

CVEO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Civeo Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 172.67M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

RGP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Resources Connection, Inc. reported an operating income of -8.35M and revenue of 107.93M, resulting in an operating margin of -7.7%.

CVEO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Civeo Corporation reported a net income of -3.81M and revenue of 172.67M, resulting in a net margin of -2.2%.

RGP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Resources Connection, Inc. reported a net income of -9.47M and revenue of 107.93M, resulting in a net margin of -8.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CVEO and RGP have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RGP has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to CVEO (11.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVEO dropped -98.72% vs RGP's -83.07%.

CVEO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVEO and RGP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer