CURE vs. ICLN
Compare and contrast key facts about Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN).
CURE and ICLN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CURE is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the Health Care Select Sector Index (300%). It was launched on Jun 15, 2011. ICLN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Clean Energy Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2008. Both CURE and ICLN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CURE or ICLN.
Performance
CURE vs. ICLN - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CURE achieves a 3.19% return, which is significantly higher than ICLN's -21.91% return. Over the past 10 years, CURE has outperformed ICLN with an annualized return of 13.53%, while ICLN has yielded a comparatively lower 3.52% annualized return.
CURE
3.19%
-16.88%
-12.40%
19.53%
10.92%
13.53%
ICLN
-21.91%
-9.51%
-17.79%
-12.27%
3.78%
3.52%
Key characteristics
| CURE | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.67 | -0.56 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.08 | -0.67 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.14 | 0.92 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.55 | -0.20 |
| Martin Ratio | 2.41 | -1.24 |
| Ulcer Index | 9.00% | 11.28% |
| Daily Std Dev | 32.25% | 24.81% |
| Max Drawdown | -69.19% | -87.16% |
| Current Drawdown | -26.98% | -68.04% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CURE vs. ICLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
CURE has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than ICLN's 0.46% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between CURE and ICLN is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CURE vs. ICLN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CURE vs. ICLN - Dividend Comparison
CURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than ICLN's 1.81% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CURE Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares | 1.47% | 2.02% | 0.38% | 0.02% | 0.17% | 0.40% | 0.70% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.24% |
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 1.81% | 1.59% | 0.89% | 1.18% | 0.34% | 1.36% | 2.77% | 2.49% | 3.88% | 2.36% | 2.83% | 2.11% |
Drawdowns
CURE vs. ICLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CURE drawdown since its inception was -69.19%, smaller than the maximum ICLN drawdown of -87.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CURE and ICLN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CURE vs. ICLN - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) has a higher volatility of 11.11% compared to iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) at 9.50%. This indicates that CURE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.