CUKX.L vs. VEUR.AS
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (VEUR.AS).
CUKX.L and VEUR.AS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CUKX.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE 100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. VEUR.AS is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe NR EUR. It was launched on May 21, 2013. Both CUKX.L and VEUR.AS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CUKX.L or VEUR.AS.
Key characteristics
| CUKX.L | VEUR.AS | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 10.27% | 11.14% |
| 1Y Return | 14.89% | 20.68% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.35% | 7.77% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 6.62% | 9.01% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 6.32% | 7.19% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.41 | 1.89 |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.08% | 10.39% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.50% | -35.63% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.93% | -2.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between CUKX.L and VEUR.AS is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
CUKX.L vs. VEUR.AS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CUKX.L achieves a 10.27% return, which is significantly lower than VEUR.AS's 11.14% return. Over the past 10 years, CUKX.L has underperformed VEUR.AS with an annualized return of 6.32%, while VEUR.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 7.19% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CUKX.L vs. VEUR.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CUKX.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VEUR.AS's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CUKX.L vs. VEUR.AS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (VEUR.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CUKX.L vs. VEUR.AS - Dividend Comparison
CUKX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VEUR.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUKX.L iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VEUR.AS Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF | 2.95% | 3.00% | 3.32% | 2.66% | 2.24% | 3.24% | 3.62% | 3.05% | 3.19% | 3.13% | 3.79% | 0.94% |
Drawdowns
CUKX.L vs. VEUR.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CUKX.L drawdown since its inception was -34.50%, roughly equal to the maximum VEUR.AS drawdown of -35.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUKX.L and VEUR.AS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CUKX.L vs. VEUR.AS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L) is 3.66%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (VEUR.AS) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that CUKX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEUR.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.