PortfoliosLab logo
CUBE vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CUBE and VOO is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CUBE vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CubeSmart (CUBE) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CUBE:

0.34

VOO:

0.74

Sortino Ratio

CUBE:

0.60

VOO:

1.04

Omega Ratio

CUBE:

1.07

VOO:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

CUBE:

0.24

VOO:

0.68

Martin Ratio

CUBE:

0.50

VOO:

2.58

Ulcer Index

CUBE:

15.46%

VOO:

4.93%

Daily Std Dev

CUBE:

24.82%

VOO:

19.54%

Max Drawdown

CUBE:

-93.15%

VOO:

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

CUBE:

-18.90%

VOO:

-3.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CUBE achieves a 2.26% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, CUBE has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 10.28%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.81% annualized return.


CUBE

YTD

2.26%

1M

5.14%

6M

-11.58%

1Y

8.31%

3Y*

3.19%

5Y*

13.05%

10Y*

10.28%

VOO

YTD

0.90%

1M

6.28%

6M

-1.46%

1Y

14.27%

3Y*

14.31%

5Y*

15.89%

10Y*

12.81%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CubeSmart

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CUBE vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CUBE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CUBE is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CUBE is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CUBE is 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CUBE is 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CUBE is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CUBE is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VOO is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VOO is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VOO is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VOO is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VOO is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VOO is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CUBE vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CubeSmart (CUBE) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CUBE Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CUBE and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CUBE vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

CUBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%, more than VOO's 1.29% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CUBE
CubeSmart
4.82%3.57%4.27%4.42%2.55%3.96%4.10%4.25%3.84%3.36%2.25%2.49%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.29%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%

Drawdowns

CUBE vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CUBE drawdown since its inception was -93.15%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUBE and VOO.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CUBE vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

CubeSmart (CUBE) has a higher volatility of 7.32% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.84%. This indicates that CUBE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...