PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CUBE vs. NSA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CUBENSA
YTD Return6.50%6.54%
1Y Return38.03%48.88%
3Y Return (Ann)-0.23%-7.16%
5Y Return (Ann)13.52%10.27%
Sharpe Ratio1.541.65
Sortino Ratio2.192.44
Omega Ratio1.271.31
Calmar Ratio1.170.91
Martin Ratio5.425.17
Ulcer Index6.82%9.22%
Daily Std Dev24.00%28.99%
Max Drawdown-93.15%-55.05%
Current Drawdown-11.54%-29.03%

Fundamentals


CUBENSA
Market Cap$11.04B$6.24B
EPS$1.75$1.74
PE Ratio27.3124.39
PEG Ratio6.313.14
Total Revenue (TTM)$1.06B$795.63M
Gross Profit (TTM)$596.82M$437.49M
EBITDA (TTM)$692.99M$422.24M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between CUBE and NSA is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

CUBE vs. NSA - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CUBE having a 6.50% return and NSA slightly higher at 6.54%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
13.35%
15.45%
CUBE
NSA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CUBE vs. NSA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CubeSmart (CUBE) and National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CUBE
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CUBE, currently valued at 1.54, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.54
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CUBE, currently valued at 2.19, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.19
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CUBE, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.27
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CUBE, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.17
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CUBE, currently valued at 5.42, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.005.42
NSA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NSA, currently valued at 1.65, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.65
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for NSA, currently valued at 2.44, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.44
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for NSA, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.31
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for NSA, currently valued at 0.91, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.91
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for NSA, currently valued at 5.17, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.005.17

CUBE vs. NSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CUBE Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the NSA Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CUBE and NSA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.54
1.65
CUBE
NSA

Dividends

CUBE vs. NSA - Dividend Comparison

CUBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, less than NSA's 5.28% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CUBE
CubeSmart
4.27%4.27%4.42%2.55%3.96%4.10%4.25%3.84%3.36%2.25%2.49%2.89%
NSA
National Storage Affiliates Trust
5.28%5.38%5.95%2.30%3.75%3.78%4.38%3.82%3.99%3.15%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CUBE vs. NSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CUBE drawdown since its inception was -93.15%, which is greater than NSA's maximum drawdown of -55.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUBE and NSA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-11.54%
-29.03%
CUBE
NSA

Volatility

CUBE vs. NSA - Volatility Comparison

CubeSmart (CUBE) has a higher volatility of 8.29% compared to National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA) at 7.75%. This indicates that CUBE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.29%
7.75%
CUBE
NSA

Financials

CUBE vs. NSA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CubeSmart and National Storage Affiliates Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items