CUBE vs. NSA
Compare and contrast key facts about CubeSmart (CUBE) and National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA).
Performance
CUBE vs. NSA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CUBE vs. NSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUBE CubeSmart | 3.18% | -11.59% | -4.53% | 20.50% | -26.31% | 74.59% | 11.67% | 14.12% | 3.42% | 12.74% |
NSA National Storage Affiliates Trust | 36.29% | -20.19% | -3.53% | 21.94% | -45.37% | 98.04% | 11.67% | 32.41% | 1.21% | 29.01% |
Fundamentals
CUBE:
$2.18
NSA:
$1.17
CUBE:
16.78
NSA:
32.30
CUBE:
1.78
NSA:
2.92
CUBE:
4.99
NSA:
3.85
CUBE:
$1.12B
NSA:
$752.93M
CUBE:
$511.19M
NSA:
$399.82M
CUBE:
$703.57M
NSA:
$390.84M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CUBE achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly lower than NSA's 36.29% return. Over the past 10 years, CUBE has underperformed NSA with an annualized return of 5.16%, while NSA has yielded a comparatively higher 11.23% annualized return.
CUBE
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- -10.91%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 6M
- -7.33%
- 1Y
- -9.59%
- 3Y*
- -3.30%
- 5Y*
- 3.01%
- 10Y*
- 5.16%
NSA
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- 9.79%
- YTD
- 36.29%
- 6M
- 29.71%
- 1Y
- 3.03%
- 3Y*
- 2.96%
- 5Y*
- 4.13%
- 10Y*
- 11.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CUBE vs. NSA — Risk / Return Rank
CUBE
NSA
CUBE vs. NSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CubeSmart (CUBE) and National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CUBE | NSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | 0.07 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | 0.51 | -0.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.06 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 0.19 | -0.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | 0.29 | -1.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CUBE | NSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.40 | 0.07 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.13 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 | 0.36 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.51 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between CUBE and NSA is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CUBE vs. NSA - Dividend Comparison
CUBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, less than NSA's 6.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUBE CubeSmart | 5.70% | 5.77% | 3.57% | 4.27% | 4.42% | 2.55% | 3.96% | 4.10% | 4.25% | 3.84% | 3.36% | 2.25% |
NSA National Storage Affiliates Trust | 6.04% | 8.08% | 5.94% | 5.38% | 5.95% | 2.30% | 3.75% | 3.78% | 4.38% | 3.82% | 3.99% | 3.15% |
Drawdowns
CUBE vs. NSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CUBE drawdown since its inception was -93.15%, which is greater than NSA's maximum drawdown of -55.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUBE and NSA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CUBE | NSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.15% | -55.05% | -38.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.36% | -25.55% | +8.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.93% | -55.05% | +18.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.43% | -55.05% | +13.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.66% | -30.10% | +2.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.05% | -17.96% | -4.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.83% | 16.84% | -8.01% |
Volatility
CUBE vs. NSA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CubeSmart (CUBE) is 6.80%, while National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA) has a volatility of 28.42%. This indicates that CUBE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CUBE | NSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.80% | 28.42% | -21.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.63% | 32.40% | -16.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.38% | 41.59% | -17.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.22% | 31.43% | -6.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.35% | 31.12% | -5.77% |
Financials
CUBE vs. NSA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CubeSmart and National Storage Affiliates Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities