PortfoliosLab logo
CUBE vs. COLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CUBE and COLD is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.4

Performance

CUBE vs. COLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CubeSmart (CUBE) and Americold Realty Trust (COLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%120.00%140.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
112.23%
35.28%
CUBE
COLD

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CUBE:

0.41

COLD:

-0.27

Sortino Ratio

CUBE:

0.73

COLD:

-0.18

Omega Ratio

CUBE:

1.09

COLD:

0.98

Calmar Ratio

CUBE:

0.32

COLD:

-0.16

Martin Ratio

CUBE:

0.70

COLD:

-0.41

Ulcer Index

CUBE:

14.56%

COLD:

19.66%

Daily Std Dev

CUBE:

24.92%

COLD:

30.31%

Max Drawdown

CUBE:

-93.15%

COLD:

-51.05%

Current Drawdown

CUBE:

-19.26%

COLD:

-45.60%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CUBE:

$9.42B

COLD:

$5.48B

EPS

CUBE:

$1.72

COLD:

-$0.33

PEG Ratio

CUBE:

6.31

COLD:

4.03

PS Ratio

CUBE:

8.82

COLD:

2.16

PB Ratio

CUBE:

3.24

COLD:

1.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

CUBE:

$1.08B

COLD:

$2.00B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CUBE:

$786.11M

COLD:

$1.05B

EBITDA (TTM)

CUBE:

$578.78M

COLD:

$255.64M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CUBE achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly higher than COLD's -8.15% return.


CUBE

YTD

1.81%

1M

1.38%

6M

-7.83%

1Y

7.46%

5Y*

16.22%

10Y*

10.69%

COLD

YTD

-8.15%

1M

-9.41%

6M

-21.77%

1Y

-9.85%

5Y*

-5.06%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CUBE vs. COLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CUBE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CUBE is 6161
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CUBE is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CUBE is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CUBE is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CUBE is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CUBE is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

COLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COLD is 3737
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COLD is 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COLD is 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COLD is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COLD is 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COLD is 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CUBE vs. COLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CubeSmart (CUBE) and Americold Realty Trust (COLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for CUBE, currently valued at 0.41, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
CUBE: 0.41
COLD: -0.27
The chart of Sortino ratio for CUBE, currently valued at 0.73, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
CUBE: 0.73
COLD: -0.18
The chart of Omega ratio for CUBE, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
CUBE: 1.09
COLD: 0.98
The chart of Calmar ratio for CUBE, currently valued at 0.32, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
CUBE: 0.32
COLD: -0.16
The chart of Martin ratio for CUBE, currently valued at 0.70, compared to the broader market-40.00-30.00-20.00-10.000.0010.0020.00
CUBE: 0.70
COLD: -0.41

The current CUBE Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is higher than the COLD Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CUBE and COLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.50-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.41
-0.27
CUBE
COLD

Dividends

CUBE vs. COLD - Dividend Comparison

CUBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, more than COLD's 4.58% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CUBE
CubeSmart
4.84%3.57%4.27%4.42%2.55%3.96%4.10%4.25%3.84%3.36%2.25%2.49%
COLD
Americold Realty Trust
4.58%4.11%2.91%3.11%2.68%2.25%2.28%2.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CUBE vs. COLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CUBE drawdown since its inception was -93.15%, which is greater than COLD's maximum drawdown of -51.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUBE and COLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-19.26%
-45.60%
CUBE
COLD

Volatility

CUBE vs. COLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CubeSmart (CUBE) is 13.54%, while Americold Realty Trust (COLD) has a volatility of 17.14%. This indicates that CUBE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
13.54%
17.14%
CUBE
COLD

Financials

CUBE vs. COLD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CubeSmart and Americold Realty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M800.00M20212022202320242025
273.04M
666.44M
(CUBE) Total Revenue
(COLD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CUBE vs. COLD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CubeSmart and Americold Realty Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
100.0%
(CUBE) Gross Margin
(COLD) Gross Margin
CUBE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CubeSmart reported a gross profit of 273.04M and revenue of 273.04M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
COLD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Americold Realty Trust reported a gross profit of 666.44M and revenue of 666.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
CUBE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CubeSmart reported an operating income of -453.00K and revenue of 273.04M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.2%.
COLD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Americold Realty Trust reported an operating income of -8.41M and revenue of 666.44M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.3%.
CUBE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CubeSmart reported a net income of 89.20M and revenue of 273.04M, resulting in a net margin of 32.7%.
COLD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Americold Realty Trust reported a net income of -36.22M and revenue of 666.44M, resulting in a net margin of -5.4%.