CUBE vs. COLD

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CubeSmart (CUBE) and Americold Realty Trust (COLD).

Performance

CUBE vs. COLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CubeSmart (CUBE) and Americold Realty Trust (COLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CUBE vs. COLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CUBE CubeSmart	3.18%	-11.59%	-4.53%	20.50%	-26.31%	74.59%	11.67%	14.12%	10.53%
COLD Americold Realty Trust	-9.06%	-36.17%	-26.72%	10.11%	-10.89%	-9.89%	9.03%	40.61%	48.27%

Fundamentals

EPS CUBE : $2.18 COLD : -$0.40
PS Ratio CUBE : 4.99 COLD : 1.26
Total Revenue (TTM) CUBE : $1.12B COLD : $2.60B
Gross Profit (TTM) CUBE : $511.19M COLD : $104.66M
EBITDA (TTM) CUBE : $703.57M COLD : $379.41M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CUBE achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly higher than COLD's -9.06% return.

CUBE

• 1D: 2.09%
• 1M: -10.91%
• YTD: 3.18%
• 6M: -7.33%
• 1Y: -9.59%
• 3Y*: -3.30%
• 5Y*: 3.01%
• 10Y*: 5.16%

COLD

• 1D: 2.05%
• 1M: -12.66%
• YTD: -9.06%
• 6M: -2.78%
• 1Y: -42.73%
• 3Y*: -22.67%
• 5Y*: -18.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CUBE vs. COLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CUBE

CUBE Risk / Return Rank: 24
CUBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
CUBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
CUBE Omega Ratio Rank: 22
CUBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
CUBE Martin Ratio Rank: 26

COLD

COLD Risk / Return Rank: 8
COLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
COLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
COLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7
COLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
COLD Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CUBE vs. COLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CubeSmart (CUBE) and Americold Realty Trust (COLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CUBE	COLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.40	-1.01	+0.61
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.41	-1.59	+1.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	0.82	+0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.47	-0.85	+0.38
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.93	-1.32	+0.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CUBE vs. COLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CUBE Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is higher than the COLD Sharpe Ratio of -1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CUBE and COLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CUBE	COLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.40	-1.01	+0.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	-0.59	+0.71
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.20	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	-0.06	+0.28

Correlation

The correlation between CUBE and COLD is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CUBE vs. COLD - Dividend Comparison

CUBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, less than COLD's 8.03% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CUBE CubeSmart	5.70%	5.77%	3.57%	4.27%	4.42%	2.55%	3.96%	4.10%	4.25%	3.84%	3.36%	2.25%
COLD Americold Realty Trust	8.03%	7.15%	4.11%	2.91%	3.11%	2.68%	2.25%	2.28%	2.75%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CUBE vs. COLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CUBE drawdown since its inception was -93.15%, which is greater than COLD's maximum drawdown of -70.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUBE and COLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CUBE	COLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.15%	-70.76%	-22.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.36%	-51.32%	+33.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.93%	-70.76%	+33.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.66%	-65.62%	+37.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.05%	-21.48%	-0.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.83%	33.22%	-24.39%

Volatility

CUBE vs. COLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CubeSmart (CUBE) is 6.80%, while Americold Realty Trust (COLD) has a volatility of 11.48%. This indicates that CUBE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CUBE	COLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.80%	11.48%	-4.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.63%	31.23%	-15.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.38%	42.66%	-18.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.22%	31.32%	-6.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.35%	31.41%	-6.06%

Financials