PortfoliosLab logo
CUBE vs. AMT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CUBE and AMT is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CUBE vs. AMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CubeSmart (CUBE) and American Tower Corporation (AMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CUBE:

0.34

AMT:

0.59

Sortino Ratio

CUBE:

0.60

AMT:

1.14

Omega Ratio

CUBE:

1.07

AMT:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

CUBE:

0.24

AMT:

0.54

Martin Ratio

CUBE:

0.50

AMT:

1.57

Ulcer Index

CUBE:

15.46%

AMT:

12.67%

Daily Std Dev

CUBE:

24.82%

AMT:

27.64%

Max Drawdown

CUBE:

-93.15%

AMT:

-98.70%

Current Drawdown

CUBE:

-18.90%

AMT:

-21.03%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CUBE:

$9.73B

AMT:

$100.05B

EPS

CUBE:

$1.69

AMT:

$6.22

PE Ratio

CUBE:

25.27

AMT:

34.36

PEG Ratio

CUBE:

6.31

AMT:

52.77

PS Ratio

CUBE:

9.01

AMT:

9.83

PB Ratio

CUBE:

3.37

AMT:

28.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

CUBE:

$1.08B

AMT:

$10.53B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CUBE:

$703.18M

AMT:

$7.21B

EBITDA (TTM)

CUBE:

$695.30M

AMT:

$7.45B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CUBE achieves a 2.26% return, which is significantly lower than AMT's 18.00% return. Over the past 10 years, CUBE has underperformed AMT with an annualized return of 10.28%, while AMT has yielded a comparatively higher 11.16% annualized return.


CUBE

YTD

2.26%

1M

5.14%

6M

-11.58%

1Y

8.31%

3Y*

3.19%

5Y*

13.05%

10Y*

10.28%

AMT

YTD

18.00%

1M

-4.77%

6M

4.47%

1Y

16.23%

3Y*

-2.66%

5Y*

-0.98%

10Y*

11.16%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CubeSmart

American Tower Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CUBE vs. AMT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CUBE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CUBE is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CUBE is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CUBE is 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CUBE is 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CUBE is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CUBE is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

AMT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AMT is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AMT is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AMT is 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AMT is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AMT is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AMT is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CUBE vs. AMT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CubeSmart (CUBE) and American Tower Corporation (AMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CUBE Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the AMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CUBE and AMT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CUBE vs. AMT - Dividend Comparison

CUBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%, more than AMT's 3.06% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CUBE
CubeSmart
4.82%3.57%4.27%4.42%2.55%3.96%4.10%4.25%3.84%3.36%2.25%2.49%
AMT
American Tower Corporation
3.06%3.53%2.99%2.77%1.78%2.02%1.64%1.99%1.84%2.05%1.87%1.42%

Drawdowns

CUBE vs. AMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CUBE drawdown since its inception was -93.15%, smaller than the maximum AMT drawdown of -98.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUBE and AMT.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CUBE vs. AMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CubeSmart (CUBE) is 7.32%, while American Tower Corporation (AMT) has a volatility of 7.85%. This indicates that CUBE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CUBE vs. AMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CubeSmart and American Tower Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20212022202320242025
273.04M
2.56B
(CUBE) Total Revenue
(AMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CUBE vs. AMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CubeSmart and American Tower Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
69.6%
75.2%
(CUBE) Gross Margin
(AMT) Gross Margin
CUBE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, CubeSmart reported a gross profit of 190.10M and revenue of 273.04M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.6%.

AMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, American Tower Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.93B and revenue of 2.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.2%.

CUBE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, CubeSmart reported an operating income of 114.88M and revenue of 273.04M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.1%.

AMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, American Tower Corporation reported an operating income of 1.25B and revenue of 2.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 48.9%.

CUBE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, CubeSmart reported a net income of 89.20M and revenue of 273.04M, resulting in a net margin of 32.7%.

AMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, American Tower Corporation reported a net income of 488.70M and revenue of 2.56B, resulting in a net margin of 19.1%.