PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CUBE vs. AMT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CUBEAMT
YTD Return6.50%-8.04%
1Y Return38.03%8.97%
3Y Return (Ann)-0.23%-8.05%
5Y Return (Ann)13.52%0.76%
10Y Return (Ann)12.93%9.34%
Sharpe Ratio1.540.36
Sortino Ratio2.190.67
Omega Ratio1.271.09
Calmar Ratio1.170.23
Martin Ratio5.420.92
Ulcer Index6.82%9.69%
Daily Std Dev24.00%24.61%
Max Drawdown-93.15%-98.70%
Current Drawdown-11.54%-29.93%

Fundamentals


CUBEAMT
Market Cap$11.04B$90.52B
EPS$1.75$4.16
PE Ratio27.3146.57
PEG Ratio6.311.24
Total Revenue (TTM)$1.06B$11.04B
Gross Profit (TTM)$596.82M$6.09B
EBITDA (TTM)$692.99M$6.65B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between CUBE and AMT is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CUBE vs. AMT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CUBE achieves a 6.50% return, which is significantly higher than AMT's -8.04% return. Over the past 10 years, CUBE has outperformed AMT with an annualized return of 12.93%, while AMT has yielded a comparatively lower 9.34% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
14.71%
5.24%
CUBE
AMT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CUBE vs. AMT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CubeSmart (CUBE) and American Tower Corporation (AMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CUBE
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CUBE, currently valued at 1.54, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.54
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CUBE, currently valued at 2.19, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.19
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CUBE, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.27
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CUBE, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.17
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CUBE, currently valued at 5.42, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.005.42
AMT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AMT, currently valued at 0.36, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.36
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AMT, currently valued at 0.67, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.67
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AMT, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.09
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AMT, currently valued at 0.23, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.23
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AMT, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.92

CUBE vs. AMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CUBE Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the AMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CUBE and AMT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.54
0.36
CUBE
AMT

Dividends

CUBE vs. AMT - Dividend Comparison

CUBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, more than AMT's 3.39% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CUBE
CubeSmart
4.27%4.27%4.42%2.55%3.96%4.10%4.25%3.84%3.36%2.25%2.49%2.89%
AMT
American Tower Corporation
3.39%2.99%2.77%1.78%2.02%1.64%1.99%1.84%2.05%1.87%1.42%1.38%

Drawdowns

CUBE vs. AMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CUBE drawdown since its inception was -93.15%, smaller than the maximum AMT drawdown of -98.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUBE and AMT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-11.54%
-29.93%
CUBE
AMT

Volatility

CUBE vs. AMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CubeSmart (CUBE) is 8.29%, while American Tower Corporation (AMT) has a volatility of 11.02%. This indicates that CUBE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.29%
11.02%
CUBE
AMT

Financials

CUBE vs. AMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CubeSmart and American Tower Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items