CTVA vs. GGG
CTVA (Corteva, Inc.) and GGG (Graco Inc.) are both stocks. CTVA operates in Agricultural Inputs (Basic Materials), while GGG operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, CTVA returned 15.79%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for GGG. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CTVA vs. GGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTVA achieves a 28.41% return, which is significantly higher than GGG's -9.11% return.
CTVA
- 1D
- 2.17%
- 1M
- 12.53%
- 6M
- 25.38%
- YTD
- 28.41%
- 1Y
- 17.59%
- 3Y*
- 17.55%
- 5Y*
- 15.79%
- 10Y*
- —
GGG
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- 6M
- -13.32%
- YTD
- -9.11%
- 1Y
- -14.47%
- 3Y*
- -3.53%
- 5Y*
- 0.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.07%
CTVA vs. GGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTVA Corteva, Inc. | 28.41% | 18.89% | 20.24% | -17.51% | 25.58% | 23.55% | 33.49% | 0.32% |
GGG Graco Inc. | -9.11% | -1.46% | -1.68% | 30.62% | -15.48% | 12.56% | 40.97% | 9.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTVA and GGG is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2019 | 0.43 |
The correlation between CTVA and GGG shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CTVA:
$57.30B
GGG:
$12.28B
CTVA:
$1.72
GGG:
$4.60
CTVA:
49.78
GGG:
16.09
CTVA:
3.23
GGG:
3.69
CTVA:
$17.89B
GGG:
$2.25B
CTVA:
$6.00B
GGG:
$1.18B
CTVA:
$2.68B
GGG:
$712.41M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTVA vs. GGG — Risk / Return Rank
CTVA
GGG
CTVA vs. GGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corteva, Inc. (CTVA) and Graco Inc. (GGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CTVA | GGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.88 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | -0.69 | +1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.91 | -1.53 | +3.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CTVA vs. GGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTVA drawdown since its inception was -34.76%, smaller than the maximum GGG drawdown of -68.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTVA and GGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTVA | GGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.76% | -68.77% | +34.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.50% | -22.55% | +4.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.95% | -22.55% | -0.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.76% | -28.98% | -5.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.23% | -21.69% | +20.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.47% | -12.12% | +1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.23% | 10.45% | -2.22% |
Volatility
CTVA vs. GGG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Corteva, Inc. (CTVA) is 5.69%, while Graco Inc. (GGG) has a volatility of 6.04%. This indicates that CTVA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTVA | GGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.69% | 6.04% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.00% | 14.68% | +1.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.61% | 19.37% | +4.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.97% | 22.69% | +4.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.56% | 24.67% | +7.89% |
Dividends
CTVA vs. GGG - Dividend Comparison
CTVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than GGG's 1.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTVA Corteva, Inc. | 0.84% | 1.04% | 1.16% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.14% | 1.34% | 0.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GGG Graco Inc. | 1.54% | 1.34% | 1.21% | 1.08% | 1.25% | 0.93% | 0.97% | 1.23% | 1.27% | 1.06% | 1.59% | 1.67% |
Financials
CTVA vs. GGG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Corteva, Inc. and Graco Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CTVA vs. GGG - Profitability Comparison
CTVA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Corteva, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GGG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Graco Inc. reported a gross profit of 280.64M and revenue of 540.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.0%.
CTVA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Corteva, Inc. reported an operating income of 725.00M and revenue of 4.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.8%.
GGG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Graco Inc. reported an operating income of 137.78M and revenue of 540.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.5%.
CTVA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Corteva, Inc. reported a net income of 720.00M and revenue of 4.91B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.
GGG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Graco Inc. reported a net income of 118.51M and revenue of 540.14M, resulting in a net margin of 21.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CTVA and GGG have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GGG has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to CTVA (5.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTVA dropped -34.76% vs GGG's -68.77%.
CTVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CTVA and GGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer