CTRA vs. MRO
CTRA (Coterra Energy Inc.) and MRO (Marathon Oil Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Oil & Gas E&P industry within the Energy sector. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CTRA vs. MRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CTRA
- 1D
- -8.62%
- 1M
- -7.97%
- YTD
- 24.61%
- 6M
- 24.28%
- 1Y
- 33.09%
- 3Y*
- 12.65%
- 5Y*
- 19.04%
- 10Y*
- 6.42%
MRO
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CTRA vs. MRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTRA Coterra Energy Inc. | 24.61% | 6.68% | 3.38% | 8.72% | 39.15% | 23.50% | -4.33% | -20.78% | -21.07% | 23.26% |
MRO Marathon Oil Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 20.15% | -9.29% | 66.91% | 149.77% | -50.38% | -3.93% | -14.37% | -0.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTRA and MRO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 1990 | 0.47 |
The correlation between CTRA and MRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (3 years) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CTRA:
$6.48B
MRO:
$6.58B
CTRA:
$2.63B
MRO:
$3.50B
CTRA:
$4.83B
MRO:
$4.23B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTRA vs. MRO — Risk / Return Rank
CTRA
MRO
CTRA vs. MRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) and Marathon Oil Corporation (MRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CTRA | MRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.61 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.08 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.51 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CTRA | MRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | — | — |
Drawdowns
CTRA vs. MRO - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTRA | MRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.33% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.96% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.38% | — | — |
Volatility
CTRA vs. MRO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTRA | MRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.41% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.40% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.69% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.49% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.56% | — | — |
Dividends
CTRA vs. MRO - Dividend Comparison
CTRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, while MRO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTRA Coterra Energy Inc. | 2.03% | 3.34% | 3.29% | 4.58% | 8.47% | 5.89% | 2.46% | 2.01% | 1.12% | 0.59% | 0.34% | 0.45% |
MRO Marathon Oil Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.54% | 1.70% | 1.18% | 1.10% | 1.20% | 1.47% | 1.39% | 1.18% | 1.16% | 5.40% |
Financials
CTRA vs. MRO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Coterra Energy Inc. and Marathon Oil Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CTRA and MRO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CTRA and MRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer