PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CTLT vs. UHS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CTLTUHS
YTD Return31.87%37.24%
1Y Return79.00%60.89%
3Y Return (Ann)-22.73%17.59%
5Y Return (Ann)3.84%8.61%
10Y Return (Ann)9.46%8.32%
Sharpe Ratio2.912.24
Sortino Ratio5.242.83
Omega Ratio1.761.41
Calmar Ratio1.003.47
Martin Ratio17.5912.27
Ulcer Index4.36%5.16%
Daily Std Dev26.28%28.29%
Max Drawdown-77.62%-60.27%
Current Drawdown-58.38%-13.65%

Fundamentals


CTLTUHS
Market Cap$10.79B$13.91B
EPS-$2.28$15.02
PEG Ratio2.971.87
Total Revenue (TTM)$4.42B$15.42B
Gross Profit (TTM)$965.00M$3.99B
EBITDA (TTM)$431.00M$2.12B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between CTLT and UHS is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CTLT vs. UHS - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CTLT achieves a 31.87% return, which is significantly lower than UHS's 37.24% return. Over the past 10 years, CTLT has outperformed UHS with an annualized return of 9.46%, while UHS has yielded a comparatively lower 8.32% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.72%
16.79%
CTLT
UHS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CTLT vs. UHS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalent, Inc. (CTLT) and Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CTLT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CTLT, currently valued at 2.91, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.91
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CTLT, currently valued at 5.24, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.005.24
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CTLT, currently valued at 1.76, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.76
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CTLT, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.00
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CTLT, currently valued at 17.59, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0017.59
UHS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for UHS, currently valued at 2.16, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.16
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for UHS, currently valued at 2.75, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.75
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for UHS, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.40
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for UHS, currently valued at 3.33, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.33
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for UHS, currently valued at 11.64, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0011.64

CTLT vs. UHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTLT Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is higher than the UHS Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTLT and UHS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.91
2.16
CTLT
UHS

Dividends

CTLT vs. UHS - Dividend Comparison

CTLT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CTLT
Catalent, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UHS
Universal Health Services, Inc.
0.38%0.52%0.57%0.62%0.15%0.42%0.34%0.35%0.38%0.33%0.27%0.25%

Drawdowns

CTLT vs. UHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTLT drawdown since its inception was -77.62%, which is greater than UHS's maximum drawdown of -60.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTLT and UHS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-58.38%
-13.65%
CTLT
UHS

Volatility

CTLT vs. UHS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Catalent, Inc. (CTLT) is 3.24%, while Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) has a volatility of 14.09%. This indicates that CTLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.24%
14.09%
CTLT
UHS

Financials

CTLT vs. UHS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Catalent, Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items