CTLT vs. SMH

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Catalent, Inc. (CTLT) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH).

SMH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011.

Performance

CTLT vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalent, Inc. (CTLT) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CTLT vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CTLT Catalent, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	41.29%	-0.18%	-64.84%	23.02%	84.85%	80.56%	-24.10%	52.37%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	8.84%	49.17%	39.10%	73.38%	-33.53%	42.13%	55.53%	64.45%	-9.05%	38.48%

Returns By Period

CTLT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SMH

• 1D: 2.24%
• 1M: -3.55%
• YTD: 8.84%
• 6M: 17.83%
• 1Y: 85.04%
• 3Y*: 44.53%
• 5Y*: 26.15%
• 10Y*: 31.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CTLT vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 95
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 92
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTLT vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalent, Inc. (CTLT) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CTLT	SMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.32	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.76	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.98	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.28	—

Correlation

The correlation between CTLT and SMH is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CTLT vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

CTLT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CTLT Catalent, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.28%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CTLT	SMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-84.96%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-15.95%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-45.30%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-8.02%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-41.35%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.47%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CTLT	SMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.74%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	24.02%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	36.88%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	34.68%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	32.29%	—