PortfoliosLab logo
CTLT vs. HUBS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CTLT and HUBS is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CTLT vs. HUBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalent, Inc. (CTLT) and HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CTLT:

$11.52B

HUBS:

$35.02B

EPS

CTLT:

-$2.28

HUBS:

-$0.46

PEG Ratio

CTLT:

529.00

HUBS:

4.73

PS Ratio

CTLT:

2.61

HUBS:

12.86

PB Ratio

CTLT:

3.25

HUBS:

17.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

CTLT:

$2.32B

HUBS:

$2.72B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CTLT:

$565.00M

HUBS:

$2.31B

EBITDA (TTM)

CTLT:

$346.00M

HUBS:

$88.63M

Returns By Period


CTLT

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

HUBS

YTD

-5.16%

1M

21.46%

6M

-2.40%

1Y

8.26%

5Y*

29.27%

10Y*

29.33%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CTLT vs. HUBS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTLT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CTLT is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CTLT is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CTLT is 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CTLT is 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CTLT is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CTLT is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

HUBS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HUBS is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HUBS is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HUBS is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HUBS is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HUBS is 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HUBS is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CTLT vs. HUBS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalent, Inc. (CTLT) and HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

CTLT vs. HUBS - Dividend Comparison

Neither CTLT nor HUBS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CTLT vs. HUBS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Volatility

CTLT vs. HUBS - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...

Financials

CTLT vs. HUBS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Catalent, Inc. and HubSpot, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20212022202320242025
1.02B
714.14M
(CTLT) Total Revenue
(HUBS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items