CTLT vs. HUBS

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Catalent, Inc. (CTLT) and HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS).

Performance

CTLT vs. HUBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalent, Inc. (CTLT) and HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CTLT vs. HUBS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CTLT Catalent, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	41.29%	-0.18%	-64.84%	23.02%	84.85%	80.56%	-24.10%	52.37%
HUBS HubSpot, Inc.	-39.50%	-42.41%	20.02%	100.79%	-56.14%	66.27%	150.12%	26.06%	42.23%	88.09%

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) CTLT : $4.42B HUBS : $3.13B
Gross Profit (TTM) CTLT : $965.00M HUBS : $2.62B
EBITDA (TTM) CTLT : $399.00M HUBS : $121.45M

Returns By Period

CTLT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HUBS

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: -7.89%
• YTD: -39.50%
• 6M: -44.85%
• 1Y: -58.28%
• 3Y*: -17.27%
• 5Y*: -12.95%
• 10Y*: 18.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CTLT vs. HUBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUBS

HUBS Risk / Return Rank: 6
HUBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
HUBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
HUBS Omega Ratio Rank: 5
HUBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
HUBS Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTLT vs. HUBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalent, Inc. (CTLT) and HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CTLT	HUBS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-1.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.25	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.40	—

Correlation

The correlation between CTLT and HUBS is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CTLT vs. HUBS - Dividend Comparison

Neither CTLT nor HUBS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CTLT	HUBS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-75.43%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-68.86%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-75.43%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-71.51%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-22.30%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	37.88%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CTLT	HUBS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	16.16%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	43.98%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	55.66%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	52.71%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	49.73%	—

Financials