CTAS vs. NEE
CTAS (Cintas Corporation) and NEE (NextEra Energy, Inc.) are both stocks. CTAS operates in Specialty Business Services (Industrials), while NEE operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, CTAS returned 23.61%/yr vs 13.51%/yr for NEE. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CTAS vs. NEE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTAS achieves a -5.80% return, which is significantly lower than NEE's 8.63% return. Over the past 10 years, CTAS has outperformed NEE with an annualized return of 23.61%, while NEE has yielded a comparatively lower 13.51% annualized return.
CTAS
- 1D
- -3.08%
- 1M
- 8.08%
- YTD
- -5.80%
- 6M
- -5.53%
- 1Y
- -20.40%
- 3Y*
- 14.43%
- 5Y*
- 15.92%
- 10Y*
- 23.61%
NEE
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- -8.68%
- YTD
- 8.63%
- 6M
- 6.81%
- 1Y
- 19.83%
- 3Y*
- 8.11%
- 5Y*
- 5.94%
- 10Y*
- 13.51%
CTAS vs. NEE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTAS Cintas Corporation | -5.80% | 3.78% | 22.24% | 34.82% | 2.97% | 26.51% | 32.74% | 61.73% | 9.04% | 36.32% |
NEE NextEra Energy, Inc. | 8.63% | 15.47% | 21.46% | -25.30% | -8.54% | 23.39% | 30.06% | 42.69% | 14.30% | 34.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTAS and NEE is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2003 | 0.35 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CTAS and NEE has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
CTAS:
$4.75
NEE:
$5.27
CTAS:
37.08
NEE:
16.32
CTAS:
2.60
NEE:
0.83
CTAS:
6.51
NEE:
4.78
CTAS:
$11.03B
NEE:
$27.93B
CTAS:
$1.33B
NEE:
$13.35B
CTAS:
$2.66B
NEE:
$14.56B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTAS vs. NEE — Risk / Return Rank
CTAS
NEE
CTAS vs. NEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cintas Corporation (CTAS) and NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CTAS | NEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.17 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | 1.37 | -2.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | 3.78 | -5.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CTAS vs. NEE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTAS drawdown since its inception was -65.32%, which is greater than NEE's maximum drawdown of -47.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTAS and NEE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTAS | NEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.32% | -47.81% | -17.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.23% | -14.53% | -12.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.68% | -34.57% | +6.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.68% | -44.97% | +17.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.38% | -44.97% | -3.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.83% | -11.50% | -10.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.04% | -8.93% | -6.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.61% | 5.25% | +10.36% |
Volatility
CTAS vs. NEE - Volatility Comparison
Cintas Corporation (CTAS) and NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) have volatilities of 8.54% and 8.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTAS | NEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.54% | 8.52% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.74% | 16.75% | -1.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.40% | 23.78% | -3.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.60% | 26.91% | -4.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.70% | 25.49% | +1.21% |
Dividends
CTAS vs. NEE - Dividend Comparison
CTAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than NEE's 2.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTAS Cintas Corporation | 1.02% | 0.89% | 0.80% | 0.83% | 0.93% | 0.77% | 0.99% | 0.95% | 1.22% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.15% |
NEE NextEra Energy, Inc. | 2.77% | 2.82% | 2.87% | 3.08% | 2.03% | 1.65% | 1.81% | 2.06% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 2.91% | 2.96% |
Financials
CTAS vs. NEE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cintas Corporation and NextEra Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CTAS vs. NEE - Profitability Comparison
CTAS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cintas Corporation reported a gross profit of -2.78B and revenue of 2.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -97.8%.
NEE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NextEra Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CTAS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cintas Corporation reported an operating income of 659.90M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.2%.
NEE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NextEra Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.21B and revenue of 6.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.0%.
CTAS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cintas Corporation reported a net income of 502.50M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.
NEE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NextEra Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 6.70B, resulting in a net margin of 32.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CTAS and NEE have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CTAS has higher volatility (8.54%) compared to NEE (8.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTAS dropped -65.32% vs NEE's -47.81%.
NEE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CTAS and NEE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer