PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CTA vs. QQQI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CTA and QQQI is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.0

Performance

CTA vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) and NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
25.34%
20.20%
CTA
QQQI

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CTA:

1.46

QQQI:

1.18

Sortino Ratio

CTA:

2.29

QQQI:

1.61

Omega Ratio

CTA:

1.26

QQQI:

1.22

Calmar Ratio

CTA:

2.25

QQQI:

1.59

Martin Ratio

CTA:

4.51

QQQI:

6.56

Ulcer Index

CTA:

4.16%

QQQI:

2.58%

Daily Std Dev

CTA:

12.84%

QQQI:

14.40%

Max Drawdown

CTA:

-18.07%

QQQI:

-10.67%

Current Drawdown

CTA:

-4.90%

QQQI:

-4.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTA achieves a 3.01% return, which is significantly higher than QQQI's 0.30% return.


CTA

YTD

3.01%

1M

0.60%

6M

14.52%

1Y

21.55%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

QQQI

YTD

0.30%

1M

-1.95%

6M

8.52%

1Y

15.43%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CTA vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTA has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.


CTA
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Expense ratio chart for CTA: current value at 0.78% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.78%
Expense ratio chart for QQQI: current value at 0.68% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.68%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CTA vs. QQQI — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CTA is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CTA is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CTA is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CTA is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CTA is 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CTA is 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQQI is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQQI is 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQQI is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQQI is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQQI is 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQQI is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CTA vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) and NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CTA, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.461.18
The chart of Sortino ratio for CTA, currently valued at 2.29, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.291.61
The chart of Omega ratio for CTA, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.261.22
The chart of Calmar ratio for CTA, currently valued at 2.25, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.002.251.59
The chart of Martin ratio for CTA, currently valued at 4.51, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.004.516.56
CTA
QQQI

The current CTA Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTA and QQQI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.201.401.601.802.002.20Wed 05Fri 07Feb 09Tue 11Thu 13Sat 15Mon 17Wed 19Fri 21Feb 23Tue 25Thu 27
1.46
1.18
CTA
QQQI

Dividends

CTA vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

CTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, less than QQQI's 14.37% yield.


TTM202420232022
CTA
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
4.66%4.80%7.78%6.58%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF
14.37%12.85%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CTA vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTA drawdown since its inception was -18.07%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -10.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTA and QQQI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-4.90%
-4.56%
CTA
QQQI

Volatility

CTA vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) is 4.04%, while NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a volatility of 4.27%. This indicates that CTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.04%
4.27%
CTA
QQQI
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab