PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CTA vs. NVDA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CTA and NVDA is -0.12. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


-0.50.00.51.0-0.1

Performance

CTA vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
12.01%
24.37%
CTA
NVDA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CTA:

1.98

NVDA:

1.94

Sortino Ratio

CTA:

3.04

NVDA:

2.42

Omega Ratio

CTA:

1.35

NVDA:

1.31

Calmar Ratio

CTA:

2.34

NVDA:

4.04

Martin Ratio

CTA:

6.14

NVDA:

11.99

Ulcer Index

CTA:

4.13%

NVDA:

9.12%

Daily Std Dev

CTA:

12.81%

NVDA:

56.63%

Max Drawdown

CTA:

-18.07%

NVDA:

-89.73%

Current Drawdown

CTA:

-1.96%

NVDA:

-13.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTA achieves a 2.12% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's -3.95% return.


CTA

YTD

2.12%

1M

3.64%

6M

12.01%

1Y

24.79%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

NVDA

YTD

-3.95%

1M

-5.85%

6M

24.37%

1Y

106.54%

5Y*

84.42%

10Y*

75.94%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CTA vs. NVDA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CTA is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CTA is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CTA is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CTA is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CTA is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CTA is 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NVDA is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NVDA is 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NVDA is 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NVDA is 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NVDA is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NVDA is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CTA vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CTA, currently valued at 1.98, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.981.94
The chart of Sortino ratio for CTA, currently valued at 3.04, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.042.42
The chart of Omega ratio for CTA, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.351.31
The chart of Calmar ratio for CTA, currently valued at 2.34, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.002.344.04
The chart of Martin ratio for CTA, currently valued at 6.14, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.006.1411.99
CTA
NVDA

The current CTA Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTA and NVDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.98
1.94
CTA
NVDA

Dividends

CTA vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

CTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than NVDA's 0.02% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CTA
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
4.70%4.80%7.78%6.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%1.70%

Drawdowns

CTA vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTA drawdown since its inception was -18.07%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTA and NVDA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-1.96%
-13.68%
CTA
NVDA

Volatility

CTA vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) is 3.71%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 24.65%. This indicates that CTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.71%
24.65%
CTA
NVDA
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab