PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CTA vs. DBMF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CTA and DBMF is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

CTA vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) and iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
32.59%
7.47%
CTA
DBMF

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CTA:

1.79

DBMF:

0.64

Sortino Ratio

CTA:

2.78

DBMF:

0.91

Omega Ratio

CTA:

1.31

DBMF:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

CTA:

2.05

DBMF:

0.39

Martin Ratio

CTA:

5.54

DBMF:

1.11

Ulcer Index

CTA:

4.13%

DBMF:

6.21%

Daily Std Dev

CTA:

12.76%

DBMF:

10.83%

Max Drawdown

CTA:

-18.07%

DBMF:

-20.39%

Current Drawdown

CTA:

-1.47%

DBMF:

-12.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTA achieves a 23.79% return, which is significantly higher than DBMF's 6.95% return.


CTA

YTD

23.79%

1M

1.87%

6M

8.23%

1Y

23.87%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

DBMF

YTD

6.95%

1M

-1.17%

6M

-8.91%

1Y

6.59%

5Y*

6.03%

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CTA vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTA has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.


DBMF
iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Expense ratio chart for DBMF: current value at 0.85% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.85%
Expense ratio chart for CTA: current value at 0.78% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.78%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CTA vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) and iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CTA, currently valued at 1.79, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.790.64
The chart of Sortino ratio for CTA, currently valued at 2.78, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.002.780.91
The chart of Omega ratio for CTA, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.311.12
The chart of Calmar ratio for CTA, currently valued at 2.05, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.050.39
The chart of Martin ratio for CTA, currently valued at 5.54, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.005.541.11
CTA
DBMF

The current CTA Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the DBMF Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTA and DBMF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.79
0.64
CTA
DBMF

Dividends

CTA vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison

CTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.69%, more than DBMF's 5.24% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019
CTA
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
10.69%7.78%6.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DBMF
iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
5.24%2.91%7.72%10.38%0.86%9.35%

Drawdowns

CTA vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTA drawdown since its inception was -18.07%, smaller than the maximum DBMF drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTA and DBMF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-1.47%
-12.18%
CTA
DBMF

Volatility

CTA vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) has a higher volatility of 4.04% compared to iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 2.14%. This indicates that CTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
4.04%
2.14%
CTA
DBMF
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab