PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CSU.TO vs. MRU.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

CSU.TO vs. MRU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO) and Metro Inc. (MRU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
17.03%
12.69%
CSU.TO
MRU.TO

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSU.TO achieves a 35.57% return, which is significantly higher than MRU.TO's 27.60% return. Over the past 10 years, CSU.TO has outperformed MRU.TO with an annualized return of 32.74%, while MRU.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.23% annualized return.


CSU.TO

YTD

35.57%

1M

0.41%

6M

20.49%

1Y

41.26%

5Y (annualized)

29.34%

10Y (annualized)

32.74%

MRU.TO

YTD

27.60%

1M

1.87%

6M

16.03%

1Y

24.75%

5Y (annualized)

10.86%

10Y (annualized)

13.23%

Fundamentals


CSU.TOMRU.TO
Market CapCA$94.29BCA$19.52B
EPSCA$43.16CA$4.16
PE Ratio103.0921.08
PEG Ratio1.214.06
Total Revenue (TTM)CA$7.14BCA$16.28B
Gross Profit (TTM)CA$6.35BCA$2.90B
EBITDA (TTM)CA$1.41BCA$1.52B

Key characteristics


CSU.TOMRU.TO
Sharpe Ratio1.881.70
Sortino Ratio2.492.50
Omega Ratio1.321.31
Calmar Ratio3.571.55
Martin Ratio11.718.73
Ulcer Index3.49%2.82%
Daily Std Dev21.85%14.49%
Max Drawdown-25.93%-47.50%
Current Drawdown-2.71%-1.93%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between CSU.TO and MRU.TO is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CSU.TO vs. MRU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO) and Metro Inc. (MRU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CSU.TO, currently valued at 1.65, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.651.44
The chart of Sortino ratio for CSU.TO, currently valued at 2.20, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.202.17
The chart of Omega ratio for CSU.TO, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.281.25
The chart of Calmar ratio for CSU.TO, currently valued at 3.54, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.541.49
The chart of Martin ratio for CSU.TO, currently valued at 9.70, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.009.706.93
CSU.TO
MRU.TO

The current CSU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the MRU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSU.TO and MRU.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.65
1.44
CSU.TO
MRU.TO

Dividends

CSU.TO vs. MRU.TO - Dividend Comparison

CSU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than MRU.TO's 1.58% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CSU.TO
Constellation Software Inc.
0.12%0.16%0.25%0.22%0.33%2.78%0.66%0.74%0.94%0.99%1.42%2.01%
MRU.TO
Metro Inc.
1.58%1.75%1.49%1.49%1.62%1.49%1.52%1.61%1.39%1.20%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CSU.TO vs. MRU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSU.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.93%, smaller than the maximum MRU.TO drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSU.TO and MRU.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-3.60%
-3.55%
CSU.TO
MRU.TO

Volatility

CSU.TO vs. MRU.TO - Volatility Comparison

Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.00% compared to Metro Inc. (MRU.TO) at 5.19%. This indicates that CSU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.00%
5.19%
CSU.TO
MRU.TO

Financials

CSU.TO vs. MRU.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Constellation Software Inc. and Metro Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in CAD except per share items