PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSSPX vs. SLYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSSPX vs. SLYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. (CSSPX) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSSPX achieves a 13.12% return, which is significantly lower than SLYV's 20.36% return. Over the past 10 years, CSSPX has underperformed SLYV with an annualized return of 4.94%, while SLYV has yielded a comparatively higher 10.28% annualized return.


CSSPX

1D
-0.15%
1M
2.56%
6M
9.88%
YTD
13.12%
1Y
17.72%
3Y*
9.42%
5Y*
1.97%
10Y*
4.94%
ALL TIME*
6.23%

SLYV

1D
0.14%
1M
0.37%
6M
12.96%
YTD
20.36%
1Y
39.50%
3Y*
12.50%
5Y*
8.01%
10Y*
10.28%
ALL TIME*
10.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$16.96M$15.72M$22.59M

CSSPX vs. SLYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSSPX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc.
13.12%10.61%0.84%10.75%-25.08%26.46%-2.35%24.80%-3.86%12.95%
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
20.36%6.54%7.28%14.82%-11.08%30.57%2.68%24.26%-12.77%11.74%

Correlation

The correlation between CSSPX and SLYV is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.60

The correlation between CSSPX and SLYV shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSSPX vs. SLYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CSSPX
CSSPX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
CSSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
CSSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

SLYV
SLYV Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SLYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYV Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYV Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CSSPX vs. SLYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. (CSSPX) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSSPXSLYVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.37

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

3.96

-2.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.08

13.69

-7.61

CSSPX vs. SLYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSSPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the SLYV Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSSPX and SLYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSSPX vs. SLYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSSPX drawdown since its inception was -40.47%, smaller than the maximum SLYV drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSSPX and SLYV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSSPXSLYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.47%

-61.15%

+20.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.05%

-9.36%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.16%

-28.68%

+10.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.72%

-28.68%

-4.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.47%

-47.73%

+7.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-1.54%

+1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.30%

-8.89%

+0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

2.71%

-0.01%

Volatility

CSSPX vs. SLYV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. (CSSPX) is 3.15%, while SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) has a volatility of 3.53%. This indicates that CSSPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSSPXSLYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.15%

3.53%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.66%

11.08%

-1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.10%

17.69%

-5.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.94%

21.69%

-5.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.98%

23.89%

-6.91%

CSSPX vs. SLYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSSPX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SLYV's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSSPX vs. SLYV - Dividend Comparison

CSSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, more than SLYV's 1.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSSPX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc.
3.08%3.46%2.78%2.85%3.02%3.21%2.41%8.61%3.95%2.79%6.89%2.68%
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
1.82%2.02%2.30%2.11%1.47%1.94%1.40%1.67%2.14%5.53%2.18%6.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSSPX and SLYV have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLYV has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to CSSPX (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSSPX dropped -40.47% vs SLYV's -61.15%.

SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSSPX and SLYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer