PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSR vs. BRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CSR vs. BRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Centerspace (CSR) and BRT Apartments Corp. (BRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSR achieves a -8.54% return, which is significantly lower than BRT's -1.45% return. Over the past 10 years, CSR has underperformed BRT with an annualized return of 4.22%, while BRT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.89% annualized return.


CSR

1D
0.97%
1M
-12.45%
YTD
-8.54%
6M
-6.55%
1Y
-0.58%
3Y*
4.00%
5Y*
1.00%
10Y*
4.22%

BRT

1D
-0.77%
1M
0.14%
YTD
-1.45%
6M
1.07%
1Y
-5.36%
3Y*
-4.06%
5Y*
0.62%
10Y*
12.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSR vs. BRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSR
Centerspace
-8.54%5.95%19.08%4.37%-44.96%62.26%1.75%54.26%-10.01%-16.48%
BRT
BRT Apartments Corp.
-1.45%-13.25%2.72%-0.04%-14.36%65.66%-3.09%57.19%3.74%48.82%

Correlation

The correlation between CSR and BRT is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 1997

0.22

The correlation between CSR and BRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CSR:

$1.01B

BRT:

$256.87M

EPS

CSR:

-$2.00

BRT:

-$0.68

PS Ratio

CSR:

3.00

BRT:

2.61

PB Ratio

CSR:

1.45

BRT:

1.52

Total Revenue (TTM)

CSR:

$351.11M

BRT:

$98.01M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CSR:

$30.57M

BRT:

$12.37M

EBITDA (TTM)

CSR:

$88.72M

BRT:

$38.34M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Centerspace

BRT Apartments Corp.

Return for Risk

CSR vs. BRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSR
CSR Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
CSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSR Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
CSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSR Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

BRT
BRT Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRT Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
BRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRT Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSR vs. BRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Centerspace (CSR) and BRT Apartments Corp. (BRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSRBRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

0.97

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

-0.34

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.08

-0.66

+0.58

CSR vs. BRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSR Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is higher than the BRT Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSR and BRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSRBRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

-0.26

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.02

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

0.35

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.05

+0.10

Drawdowns

CSR vs. BRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSR drawdown since its inception was -59.11%, smaller than the maximum BRT drawdown of -95.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSR and BRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSRBRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.11%

-95.38%

+36.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.43%

-16.00%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.28%

-27.60%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.39%

-35.28%

-18.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.39%

-58.76%

+5.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.72%

-30.33%

-3.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.91%

-50.90%

+29.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.33%

8.09%

-0.76%

Volatility

CSR vs. BRT - Volatility Comparison

Centerspace (CSR) has a higher volatility of 12.98% compared to BRT Apartments Corp. (BRT) at 4.96%. This indicates that CSR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSRBRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.98%

4.96%

+8.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.07%

13.40%

+5.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.26%

20.52%

+5.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.84%

29.22%

-2.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.10%

36.53%

-7.43%

Dividends

CSR vs. BRT - Dividend Comparison

CSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, less than BRT's 7.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRT
BRT Apartments Corp.
7.03%6.80%5.55%5.38%4.99%3.75%5.79%4.95%6.99%3.05%0.00%0.00%
CSR
Centerspace
5.12%4.62%4.54%5.02%4.98%2.56%3.96%3.86%4.42%4.93%7.29%7.48%

Financials

CSR vs. BRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Centerspace and BRT Apartments Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20222023202420252026
65.07M
24.61M
(CSR) Total Revenue
(BRT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CSR vs. BRT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Centerspace and BRT Apartments Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
88.7%
0
Portfolio components
CSR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Centerspace reported a gross profit of 57.74M and revenue of 65.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.7%.

BRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BRT Apartments Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 24.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CSR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Centerspace reported an operating income of -5.39M and revenue of 65.07M, resulting in an operating margin of -8.3%.

BRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BRT Apartments Corp. reported an operating income of -2.57M and revenue of 24.61M, resulting in an operating margin of -10.4%.

CSR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Centerspace reported a net income of 0.00 and revenue of 65.07M, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.

BRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BRT Apartments Corp. reported a net income of -2.68M and revenue of 24.61M, resulting in a net margin of -10.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CSR and BRT have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSR has higher volatility (12.98%) compared to BRT (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSR dropped -59.11% vs BRT's -95.38%.

CSR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.02 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSR and BRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer