CSPI vs. BULZ
Compare and contrast key facts about CSP Inc. (CSPI) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ).
BULZ is a passively managed fund by BMO Financial Group that tracks the performance of the Solactive FANG Innovation. It was launched on Aug 17, 2021.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CSPI or BULZ.
Key characteristics
| CSPI | BULZ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 25.33% | 6.24% |
| 1Y Return | 101.04% | 193.57% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.04 | 2.82 |
| Daily Std Dev | 95.91% | 65.26% |
| Max Drawdown | -86.27% | -94.44% |
| Current Drawdown | -56.35% | -67.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSPI and BULZ is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CSPI vs. BULZ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CSPI achieves a 25.33% return, which is significantly higher than BULZ's 6.24% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CSPI vs. BULZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CSP Inc. (CSPI) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CSPI vs. BULZ - Dividend Comparison
CSPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, while BULZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSPI CSP Inc. | 1.19% | 1.54% | 1.27% | 0.00% | 3.88% | 11.49% | 7.54% | 6.96% | 6.24% | 12.68% | 12.05% | 7.42% |
BULZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CSPI vs. BULZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSPI drawdown since its inception was -86.27%, smaller than the maximum BULZ drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSPI and BULZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CSPI vs. BULZ - Volatility Comparison
CSP Inc. (CSPI) has a higher volatility of 23.91% compared to MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) at 22.06%. This indicates that CSPI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BULZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.