CSHI vs. XYLD
Compare and contrast key facts about Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD).
CSHI and XYLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CSHI is a passively managed fund by Neos that tracks the performance of the NONE. It was launched on Aug 29, 2022. XYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE S&P 500 2% OTM BuyWrite Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2013. Both CSHI and XYLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CSHI or XYLD.
Key characteristics
| CSHI | XYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 4.95% | 15.98% |
| 1Y Return | 5.67% | 19.15% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 5.73 | 2.81 |
| Sortino Ratio | 9.68 | 3.81 |
| Omega Ratio | 2.95 | 1.74 |
| Calmar Ratio | 14.25 | 3.03 |
| Martin Ratio | 139.76 | 24.47 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.04% | 0.79% |
| Daily Std Dev | 1.00% | 6.88% |
| Max Drawdown | -0.40% | -33.46% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSHI and XYLD is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CSHI vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CSHI achieves a 4.95% return, which is significantly lower than XYLD's 15.98% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSHI vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSHI has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CSHI vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CSHI vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison
CSHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.80%, less than XYLD's 9.09% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF | 5.80% | 6.15% | 1.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 9.09% | 10.51% | 13.44% | 9.08% | 7.93% | 5.76% | 7.12% | 4.67% | 3.24% | 4.65% | 4.15% | 2.49% |
Drawdowns
CSHI vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSHI drawdown since its inception was -0.40%, smaller than the maximum XYLD drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSHI and XYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CSHI vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) is 0.13%, while Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) has a volatility of 2.34%. This indicates that CSHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.