CSHI vs. XYLD
Compare and contrast key facts about Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD).
CSHI and XYLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CSHI is a passively managed fund by Neos that tracks the performance of the NONE. It was launched on Aug 29, 2022. XYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2013. Both CSHI and XYLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CSHI vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSHI vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF | 1.30% | 5.05% | 5.66% | 6.21% | 1.46% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | -1.04% | 8.02% | 19.49% | 11.10% | -1.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSHI achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly higher than XYLD's -1.04% return.
CSHI
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 5.43%
- 3Y*
- 5.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XYLD
- 1D
- 2.01%
- 1M
- -2.96%
- YTD
- -1.04%
- 6M
- 5.33%
- 1Y
- 10.53%
- 3Y*
- 10.21%
- 5Y*
- 6.95%
- 10Y*
- 7.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSHI vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSHI has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CSHI vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank
CSHI
XYLD
CSHI vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSHI | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.71 | 0.76 | +1.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.01 | 1.22 | +2.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.01 | 1.25 | +0.76 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | 1.10 | +2.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.78 | 6.46 | +22.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSHI | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 0.76 | +1.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.10 | 0.57 | +3.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSHI and XYLD is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CSHI vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison
CSHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, less than XYLD's 10.98% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF | 4.98% | 5.11% | 5.72% | 6.15% | 1.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 10.98% | 10.51% | 11.54% | 10.51% | 13.43% | 9.07% | 7.93% | 5.76% | 7.12% | 5.18% | 3.23% | 4.65% |
Drawdowns
CSHI vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSHI drawdown since its inception was -1.69%, smaller than the maximum XYLD drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSHI and XYLD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSHI | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.69% | -33.46% | +31.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.69% | -10.14% | +8.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.39% | +3.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -3.76% | +3.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.19% | 1.72% | -1.53% |
Volatility
CSHI vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) is 0.39%, while Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) has a volatility of 4.01%. This indicates that CSHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSHI | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.39% | 4.01% | -3.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.68% | 5.82% | -5.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01% | 13.99% | -11.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.35% | 11.31% | -9.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.35% | 14.23% | -12.88% |