Correlation
The correlation between CSH-UN.TO and AEM is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
CSH-UN.TO vs. AEM
Compare and contrast key facts about Chartwell Retirement Residences (CSH-UN.TO) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CSH-UN.TO or AEM.
Performance
CSH-UN.TO vs. AEM - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
CSH-UN.TO:
3.02
AEM:
2.24
CSH-UN.TO:
4.04
AEM:
2.61
CSH-UN.TO:
1.49
AEM:
1.36
CSH-UN.TO:
5.76
AEM:
4.24
CSH-UN.TO:
18.00
AEM:
14.30
CSH-UN.TO:
3.27%
AEM:
5.26%
CSH-UN.TO:
19.29%
AEM:
34.34%
CSH-UN.TO:
-82.41%
AEM:
-90.33%
CSH-UN.TO:
0.00%
AEM:
-4.11%
Fundamentals
CSH-UN.TO:
CA$5.26B
AEM:
$59.50B
CSH-UN.TO:
CA$0.21
AEM:
$4.70
CSH-UN.TO:
88.62
AEM:
25.14
CSH-UN.TO:
5.74
AEM:
6.67
CSH-UN.TO:
4.43
AEM:
2.75
CSH-UN.TO:
CA$904.88M
AEM:
$8.94B
CSH-UN.TO:
CA$327.65M
AEM:
$4.30B
CSH-UN.TO:
CA$187.20M
AEM:
$5.17B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSH-UN.TO achieves a 25.24% return, which is significantly lower than AEM's 52.01% return. Over the past 10 years, CSH-UN.TO has underperformed AEM with an annualized return of 10.40%, while AEM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.84% annualized return.
CSH-UN.TO
25.24%
7.80%
17.33%
58.04%
20.71%
24.30%
10.40%
AEM
52.01%
0.69%
40.83%
76.05%
34.23%
15.96%
15.84%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CSH-UN.TO vs. AEM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CSH-UN.TO
AEM
CSH-UN.TO vs. AEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chartwell Retirement Residences (CSH-UN.TO) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
CSH-UN.TO vs. AEM - Dividend Comparison
CSH-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than AEM's 1.70% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSH-UN.TO Chartwell Retirement Residences | 3.49% | 3.98% | 5.19% | 7.25% | 5.18% | 5.45% | 4.30% | 4.29% | 3.53% | 2.58% | 0.08% | 0.09% |
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 1.70% | 2.05% | 2.92% | 3.08% | 2.63% | 1.35% | 1.10% | 1.09% | 0.89% | 0.86% | 1.22% | 1.29% |
Drawdowns
CSH-UN.TO vs. AEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSH-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -82.41%, smaller than the maximum AEM drawdown of -90.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSH-UN.TO and AEM.
Loading data...
Volatility
CSH-UN.TO vs. AEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Chartwell Retirement Residences (CSH-UN.TO) is 6.66%, while Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) has a volatility of 14.37%. This indicates that CSH-UN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
CSH-UN.TO vs. AEM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chartwell Retirement Residences and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CSH-UN.TO vs. AEM - Profitability Comparison
CSH-UN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Chartwell Retirement Residences reported a gross profit of 101.43M and revenue of 251.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.3%.
AEM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 1.28B and revenue of 2.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.0%.
CSH-UN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Chartwell Retirement Residences reported an operating income of 31.19M and revenue of 251.48M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.4%.
AEM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 47.0%.
CSH-UN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Chartwell Retirement Residences reported a net income of 33.18M and revenue of 251.48M, resulting in a net margin of 13.2%.
AEM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a net income of 814.73M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in a net margin of 33.0%.