PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CSGP vs. MNST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CSGP and MNST is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

CSGP vs. MNST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-2.20%
-1.87%
CSGP
MNST

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CSGP:

-0.32

MNST:

-0.58

Sortino Ratio

CSGP:

-0.29

MNST:

-0.64

Omega Ratio

CSGP:

0.97

MNST:

0.91

Calmar Ratio

CSGP:

-0.31

MNST:

-0.52

Martin Ratio

CSGP:

-0.51

MNST:

-0.97

Ulcer Index

CSGP:

18.78%

MNST:

13.88%

Daily Std Dev

CSGP:

29.61%

MNST:

23.32%

Max Drawdown

CSGP:

-71.10%

MNST:

-69.17%

Current Drawdown

CSGP:

-25.96%

MNST:

-18.78%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CSGP:

$30.28B

MNST:

$48.29B

EPS

CSGP:

$0.42

MNST:

$1.56

PE Ratio

CSGP:

175.83

MNST:

31.68

PEG Ratio

CSGP:

2.44

MNST:

1.55

Total Revenue (TTM)

CSGP:

$2.03B

MNST:

$5.68B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CSGP:

$1.58B

MNST:

$3.05B

EBITDA (TTM)

CSGP:

$72.40M

MNST:

$1.61B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSGP achieves a 3.16% return, which is significantly higher than MNST's -5.97% return. Over the past 10 years, CSGP has outperformed MNST with an annualized return of 14.71%, while MNST has yielded a comparatively lower 9.72% annualized return.


CSGP

YTD

3.16%

1M

3.37%

6M

-2.20%

1Y

-10.30%

5Y*

2.00%

10Y*

14.71%

MNST

YTD

-5.97%

1M

-4.11%

6M

-2.89%

1Y

-13.68%

5Y*

8.01%

10Y*

9.72%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CSGP vs. MNST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSGP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CSGP is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CSGP is 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CSGP is 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CSGP is 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CSGP is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CSGP is 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

MNST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MNST is 1818
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MNST is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MNST is 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MNST is 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MNST is 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MNST is 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CSGP vs. MNST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CSGP, currently valued at -0.32, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.00-0.32-0.58
The chart of Sortino ratio for CSGP, currently valued at -0.28, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.29-0.64
The chart of Omega ratio for CSGP, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.970.91
The chart of Calmar ratio for CSGP, currently valued at -0.31, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.31-0.52
The chart of Martin ratio for CSGP, currently valued at -0.51, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.51-0.97
CSGP
MNST

The current CSGP Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is higher than the MNST Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSGP and MNST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.32
-0.58
CSGP
MNST

Dividends

CSGP vs. MNST - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSGP nor MNST has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CSGP vs. MNST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSGP drawdown since its inception was -71.10%, roughly equal to the maximum MNST drawdown of -69.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSGP and MNST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-25.96%
-18.78%
CSGP
MNST

Volatility

CSGP vs. MNST - Volatility Comparison

CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) has a higher volatility of 8.72% compared to Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) at 5.07%. This indicates that CSGP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
8.72%
5.07%
CSGP
MNST

Financials

CSGP vs. MNST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CoStar Group, Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab