CSGP vs. MNST
Compare and contrast key facts about CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CSGP or MNST.
Key characteristics
CSGP | MNST | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 3.38% | -7.74% |
1Y Return | 25.61% | -2.05% |
3Y Return (Ann) | -1.08% | 3.05% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 13.12% | 12.27% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 19.19% | 16.96% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.06 | -0.09 |
Daily Std Dev | 30.03% | 21.21% |
Max Drawdown | -71.10% | -96.53% |
Current Drawdown | -9.42% | -12.65% |
Fundamentals
CSGP | MNST | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | $34.41B | $55.65B |
EPS | $0.92 | $1.54 |
PE Ratio | 91.59 | 34.51 |
PEG Ratio | 8.64 | 1.88 |
Revenue (TTM) | $2.46B | $7.14B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | $1.77B | $3.17B |
EBITDA (TTM) | $389.80M | $2.08B |
Correlation
The correlation between CSGP and MNST is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CSGP vs. MNST - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CSGP achieves a 3.38% return, which is significantly higher than MNST's -7.74% return. Over the past 10 years, CSGP has outperformed MNST with an annualized return of 19.19%, while MNST has yielded a comparatively lower 16.96% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CSGP vs. MNST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CSGP vs. MNST - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSGP nor MNST has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CSGP vs. MNST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSGP drawdown since its inception was -71.10%, smaller than the maximum MNST drawdown of -96.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSGP and MNST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CSGP vs. MNST - Volatility Comparison
CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) has a higher volatility of 12.71% compared to Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) at 4.99%. This indicates that CSGP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CSGP vs. MNST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CoStar Group, Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities