Correlation
The correlation between CSGP and MNST is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
CSGP vs. MNST
Compare and contrast key facts about CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CSGP or MNST.
Performance
CSGP vs. MNST - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
CSGP:
-0.24
MNST:
0.88
CSGP:
-0.42
MNST:
1.18
CSGP:
0.95
MNST:
1.17
CSGP:
-0.45
MNST:
0.80
CSGP:
-1.49
MNST:
3.13
CSGP:
9.25%
MNST:
6.64%
CSGP:
31.67%
MNST:
25.39%
CSGP:
-71.10%
MNST:
-69.17%
CSGP:
-25.74%
MNST:
-0.93%
Fundamentals
CSGP:
$31.48B
MNST:
$62.19B
CSGP:
$0.28
MNST:
$1.51
CSGP:
265.14
MNST:
42.15
CSGP:
2.74
MNST:
2.10
CSGP:
11.19
MNST:
8.35
CSGP:
3.68
MNST:
9.54
CSGP:
$2.81B
MNST:
$7.45B
CSGP:
$2.23B
MNST:
$4.07B
CSGP:
$165.70M
MNST:
$2.06B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSGP achieves a 3.46% return, which is significantly lower than MNST's 21.08% return. Over the past 10 years, CSGP has outperformed MNST with an annualized return of 13.62%, while MNST has yielded a comparatively lower 11.62% annualized return.
CSGP
3.46%
-10.44%
-9.64%
-7.56%
6.40%
2.43%
13.62%
MNST
21.08%
7.41%
15.42%
22.08%
12.38%
12.10%
11.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CSGP vs. MNST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CSGP
MNST
CSGP vs. MNST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
CSGP vs. MNST - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSGP nor MNST has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CSGP vs. MNST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSGP drawdown since its inception was -71.10%, roughly equal to the maximum MNST drawdown of -69.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSGP and MNST.
Loading data...
Volatility
CSGP vs. MNST - Volatility Comparison
CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) has a higher volatility of 12.88% compared to Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) at 4.92%. This indicates that CSGP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
CSGP vs. MNST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CoStar Group, Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CSGP vs. MNST - Profitability Comparison
CSGP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CoStar Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 578.90M and revenue of 732.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.1%.
MNST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.05B and revenue of 1.85B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.5%.
CSGP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CoStar Group, Inc. reported an operating income of -42.80M and revenue of 732.20M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.9%.
MNST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Monster Beverage Corporation reported an operating income of 569.75M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.7%.
CSGP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CoStar Group, Inc. reported a net income of -14.80M and revenue of 732.20M, resulting in a net margin of -2.0%.
MNST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a net income of 442.99M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in a net margin of 23.9%.