CSGP vs. MNST
CSGP (CoStar Group, Inc.) and MNST (Monster Beverage Corporation) are both stocks. CSGP operates in Real Estate - Services (Real Estate), while MNST operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, CSGP returned 4.87%/yr vs 13.33%/yr for MNST. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CSGP vs. MNST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSGP achieves a -50.33% return, which is significantly lower than MNST's 16.13% return. Over the past 10 years, CSGP has underperformed MNST with an annualized return of 4.87%, while MNST has yielded a comparatively higher 13.33% annualized return.
CSGP
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- -5.60%
- YTD
- -50.33%
- 6M
- -51.61%
- 1Y
- -55.87%
- 3Y*
- -25.84%
- 5Y*
- -16.86%
- 10Y*
- 4.87%
MNST
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 18.40%
- YTD
- 16.13%
- 6M
- 20.35%
- 1Y
- 39.15%
- 3Y*
- 14.39%
- 5Y*
- 13.30%
- 10Y*
- 13.33%
CSGP vs. MNST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSGP CoStar Group, Inc. | -50.33% | -6.08% | -18.08% | 13.08% | -2.21% | -14.50% | 54.48% | 77.36% | 13.60% | 57.54% |
MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | 16.13% | 45.87% | -8.77% | 13.48% | 5.72% | 3.85% | 45.52% | 29.11% | -22.23% | 42.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSGP and MNST is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 1998 | 0.23 |
The correlation between CSGP and MNST shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.33 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CSGP:
$13.83B
MNST:
$87.99B
CSGP:
$0.06
MNST:
$2.06
CSGP:
553.74
MNST:
43.21
CSGP:
4.11
MNST:
9.98
CSGP:
1.75
MNST:
10.08
CSGP:
$3.41B
MNST:
$8.79B
CSGP:
$2.64B
MNST:
$4.88B
CSGP:
$284.20M
MNST:
$2.70B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSGP vs. MNST — Risk / Return Rank
CSGP
MNST
CSGP vs. MNST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSGP | MNST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.45 | 1.49 | -2.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.25 | 2.36 | -4.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.69 | 1.30 | -0.61 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 2.22 | -3.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | 6.31 | -7.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSGP | MNST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.45 | 1.49 | -2.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.49 | 0.54 | -1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | 0.51 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.60 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
CSGP vs. MNST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSGP drawdown since its inception was -71.11%, roughly equal to the maximum MNST drawdown of -69.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSGP and MNST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSGP | MNST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.11% | -69.17% | -1.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.11% | -17.70% | -49.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.41% | -26.04% | -41.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.07% | -26.62% | -41.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.07% | -30.42% | -37.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.51% | -0.22% | -66.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.24% | -20.68% | -1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.96% | 6.25% | +31.71% |
Volatility
CSGP vs. MNST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) is 11.46%, while Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) has a volatility of 13.66%. This indicates that CSGP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSGP | MNST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.46% | 13.66% | -2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.87% | 19.99% | +13.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.74% | 26.34% | +12.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.65% | 24.59% | +10.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.61% | 26.25% | +6.36% |
Dividends
CSGP vs. MNST - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSGP nor MNST has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CSGP vs. MNST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CoStar Group, Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CSGP vs. MNST - Profitability Comparison
CSGP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoStar Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 701.00M and revenue of 897.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.2%.
MNST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.29B and revenue of 2.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.0%.
CSGP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoStar Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.00M and revenue of 897.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.
MNST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported an operating income of 729.96M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.0%.
CSGP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoStar Group, Inc. reported a net income of 3.00M and revenue of 897.00M, resulting in a net margin of 0.3%.
MNST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a net income of 569.49M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in a net margin of 24.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSGP and MNST have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MNST has higher volatility (13.66%) compared to CSGP (11.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSGP dropped -71.11% vs MNST's -69.17%.
MNST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSGP and MNST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer